Skip to content

enhanced CP2K easyblock, following Intel guidelines for ictce builds#138

Merged
boegel merged 26 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:cp2k
Mar 27, 2013
Merged

enhanced CP2K easyblock, following Intel guidelines for ictce builds#138
boegel merged 26 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:cp2k

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented Mar 8, 2013

No description provided.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 8, 2013

This fixes easybuilders/easybuild-framework#138

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 8, 2013

This pull request also fixes support for recent CP2K versions, in which directory structure of source was changed a bit.

Comment thread easybuild/easyblocks/c/cp2k.py Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

line too long?

@stdweird
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

stdweird commented Mar 8, 2013

@boegel besides the 2 small remarks, nice work! you should at the very least send an email to Hao Tijang (the author of the intel post), easybuild promo in the comments might be a bit of stretch though...

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2013
enhanced CP2K easyblock, following Intel guidelines for ictce builds
@boegel boegel merged commit 3e3f7cb into easybuilders:develop Mar 27, 2013
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 27, 2013

Fixed remarks, so merging.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good code handling this one; this style should be used in each other easyblock, as well:

  • It enhances orthogonality and allows to start using even things like cuBLAS and other uknown as of yet L.A. implementations (regardless if eg. cuBLAS makes sense in this case: it is always useful eg. to make performance comparison graphs among libs - and some future LA implementations will need to be handled too!)

APPLAUSE!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

boegel bows

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants