Skip to content

update LLVM easyblock for LLVM v14.0.x#2718

Merged
branfosj merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
jfgrimm:20220504174240_new_pr_llvm
May 5, 2022
Merged

update LLVM easyblock for LLVM v14.0.x#2718
branfosj merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
jfgrimm:20220504174240_new_pr_llvm

Conversation

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jfgrimm jfgrimm commented May 4, 2022

(created using eb --new-pr)

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

branfosj commented May 5, 2022

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

  • SUCCESS LLVM-7.0.0-GCCcore-7.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-7.0.1-GCCcore-8.2.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-8.0.1-GCCcore-8.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-9.0.0-GCCcore-8.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-9.0.1-GCCcore-8.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-9.0.1-GCCcore-9.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-10.0.0-GCCcore-8.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-10.0.1-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-11.0.0-GCCcore-10.2.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-11.1.0-GCCcore-10.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-12.0.1-GCCcore-10.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS LLVM-12.0.1-GCCcore-11.2.0.eb

Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f2dadd27b1046488bcb2a6997372e731 for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@branfosj branfosj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

branfosj commented May 5, 2022

Going in, thanks @jfgrimm!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit b94215b into easybuilders:develop May 5, 2022
@boegel boegel changed the title enhance llvm.py for v14.0.x update LLVM easyblock for LLVM v14.0.x May 6, 2022
@boegel boegel added update and removed enhancement labels May 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants