Skip to content

replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for MXNet (mxnet.py)#3206

Merged
boegel merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:5.0.xfrom
branfosj:20240210091418_new_pr_mxnet
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for MXNet (mxnet.py)#3206
boegel merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:5.0.xfrom
branfosj:20240210091418_new_pr_mxnet

Conversation

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@branfosj branfosj commented Feb 10, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

  • no use of EB_MXNet in easyconfigs or blocks

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

branfosj commented Feb 10, 2024

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03b - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/e4ddddb61082504fad34eca6ecaa9e50 for a full test report.

edit

== FAILED: Installation ended unsuccessfully: `/rds/projects/2017/branfosj-rse/easybuild/EL8-ice/software/Python/3.10.4-GCCcore-11.3.0/bin/python -m pip check` failed:               
mxnet 1.9.1 has requirement graphviz<0.9.0,>=0.8.1, but you have graphviz 0.20.1.

Failure is not related to this PR and the easyconfig does not enable the installation of the R extension...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bartoldeman bartoldeman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel merged commit bd8999d into easybuilders:5.0.x Mar 4, 2024
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20240210091418_new_pr_mxnet branch March 4, 2024 08:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

No open projects
Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants