Conversation
|
Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1485/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
|
Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1486/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
|
Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1487/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
|
lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@wpoely86: doing this fixes this issue for me, based on the info in https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-c-compiler/topic/338378
lib/types.h(107): error: qualified name is not allowed
typedef std::complex<double> cdouble;
...
lib/types.h(107): error: expected a ";"
typedef std::complex<double> cdouble;
It feels like a workaround for a bug though... Are we doing something wrong with $CPATH somewhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
problem was caused by having include subdir of icc included in $CPATH
fixed with wpoely86#20 (included in #756)
|
Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1494/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
|
Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1495/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
|
Jenkins: test this please |
|
Jenkins: ok to test |
|
Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1501/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
|
tested thoroughly with easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#2217 and easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#2218, good to go, thanks for the review @wpoely86! |
No description provided.