Skip to content

SSAHA2 easyconfigs for 64 and 32bits binaries#1039

Merged
boegel merged 6 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
pescobar:SSAHA2
Sep 25, 2015
Merged

SSAHA2 easyconfigs for 64 and 32bits binaries#1039
boegel merged 6 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
pescobar:SSAHA2

Conversation

@pescobar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you could drop the "" since it is empty, and remove the extra line at the very end; ditto for the other file. all other OK

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIRC I think @boegel asked me to add the "" when sanity checks is empty

@boegel am I wrong?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i've got some comment like 1yr ago ;-) otherwise this looks good

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pescobar: I don't think I ever said this, and if I did, I was wrong, so wrong.

Please change to

    dirs: [],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

boegel's PR is a good example why it worths prioritizing high to merge in older PRs ;-)
(or you end up with 3800 changed files to be merged in...)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, the sync with develop can be painful, indeed...

the main reason for them is to make sure that the latest version of the unit tests are run by Jenkins (since Jenkins just checks out the branch that corresponds to the PR)

maybe we should see if we can make Jenkins merge with develop first, and then run the tests...

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Nov 28, 2014

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/44f3eaaeb660e5ec5874 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Nov 28, 2014

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/801f3e55cd366c5f7dbc for a full test report.

@fgeorgatos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test report by @fgeorgatos
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2
Linux debian 6.0.10, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5640 @ 2.27GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/445e6d731d63033d2b2f for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

drop last lines on ecs, this triggers -gasp- Jenkins testing.

lgtm , put this in REVIEW

@pescobar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Test report by @pescobar
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos 6.5, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/2a55d5dc3ebf0d607740 for a full test report.

@rjeschmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test report by @rjeschmi
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos 6.6, AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6380, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/56e95438d2476fc60db6 for a full test report.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4473/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    dirs: [],

@boegel boegel added this to the merge sprint 2.0 milestone Sep 23, 2015
boegel and others added 2 commits September 23, 2015 20:45
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Sep 25, 2015

Jenkins: test this please

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4518/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Sep 25, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/c6374d9e930b351436a2 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Sep 25, 2015

Going in, thanks @pescobar!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2015
SSAHA2 easyconfigs for 64 and 32bits binaries
@boegel boegel merged commit 2cb830a into easybuilders:develop Sep 25, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants