...how did this happen? I ran inject-checksums, check-contrib, and only then new-pr but even then, the version without checksums got committed. I guess I was using a shell wildcard (./* and not *.eb as before) and the .eb files are alphabetically in front of the .eb.bak_... files produced by inject-checksums.

@zarybnicky That sounds like. eb --new-pr will rename easyconfig file, so the .eb.bak_... one would get the proper name based on the contents.

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 4 (2 easyconfigs in total)
generoso - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/ca32c2288caf1a2a5a90fc676d7996a4 for a full test report.

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3408.kirlia.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240 CPU @ 2.60GHz (cascadelake), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/6efdb239e8b77acb57275f5a561277ce for a full test report.

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11512 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11512 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 8168

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/83907f0bd523f24a4eb5858195007270 for a full test report.

Going in, thanks @zarybnicky!