Skip to content

{lang}[gompi/2020a] SOCI v4.0.1#12045

Merged
migueldiascosta merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
branfosj:20210125210407_new_pr_SOCI401
Jan 27, 2021
Merged

{lang}[gompi/2020a] SOCI v4.0.1#12045
migueldiascosta merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
branfosj:20210125210407_new_pr_SOCI401

Conversation

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

(created using eb --new-pr)

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@branfosj I suppose this is using gompi only because of Boost? If so, what about

--- SOCI-4.0.1-gompi-2020a.eb	2021-01-26 10:19:12.351218377 +0800
+++ SOCI-4.0.1-GCCcore-9.3.0.eb	2021-01-26 10:21:50.369736807 +0800
@@ -7,16 +7,19 @@
 description = """SOCI is a database access library for C++ that makes the illusion of embedding SQL queries in the
  regular C++ code, staying entirely within the Standard C++."""
 
-toolchain = {'name': 'gompi', 'version': '2020a'}
+toolchain = {'name': 'GCCcore', 'version': '9.3.0'}
 
 source_urls = ['https://github.com/SOCI/soci/archive']
 sources = ['v%(version)s.tar.gz']
 checksums = ['1979b4084ba644125da29dbfbd132798f7742a56caf5a0edb16756a5dbad0f31']
 
-builddependencies = [('CMake', '3.16.4')]
+builddependencies = [
+    ('binutils', '2.34'),
+    ('CMake', '3.16.4'),
+]
 
 dependencies = [
-    ('Boost', '1.72.0'),
+    ('Boost', '1.72.0', '-no_mpi'),
     ('SQLite', '3.31.1'),
     ('PostgreSQL', '12.4'),
 ]

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta added this to the next release (4.3.3?) milestone Jan 26, 2021
@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@branfosj I suppose this is using gompi only because of Boost? If so, what about

Yes, that should work. We'll also have to switch the new RStudio-Server (#12044) to use that Boost variant, as this is required as a dependency.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/739a480c13d68cb9b5f85bf0519f0551 for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor (zen), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ffdfccf30aa037308286df1a5175945f for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@migueldiascosta: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12045 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12045 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13712

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 767983511 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-5 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/754629323f40db4efa1d137415aef1dd for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Going in, thanks @branfosj!

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta merged commit c1eef90 into easybuilders:develop Jan 27, 2021
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20210125210407_new_pr_SOCI401 branch January 27, 2021 04:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants