Skip to content

{numlib,phys}[GCC/10.2.0] Geant4 v10.7.1, CLHEP v2.4.4.0#12541

Merged
migueldiascosta merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
bedroge:20210407093628_new_pr_Geant41071
Apr 8, 2021
Merged

{numlib,phys}[GCC/10.2.0] Geant4 v10.7.1, CLHEP v2.4.4.0#12541
migueldiascosta merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
bedroge:20210407093628_new_pr_Geant41071

Conversation

@bedroge
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bedroge bedroge commented Apr 7, 2021

(created using eb --new-pr)

@bedroge
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Apr 7, 2021

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
pg-interactive.hpc.rug.nl - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/836adb113665d09534eae3b5f7f8ed3b for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta added this to the 4.x milestone Apr 7, 2021
@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@migueldiascosta: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12541 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12541 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 16502

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 814709421 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/0048f598bdde91e27043d213eab5db3d for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bedroge can´t this be moved down to GCC level?

@bedroge
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Apr 7, 2021

I just updated the most recent easyconfig to this version, but I think you're right that it should be possible to use GCC instead of foss. I'll test it, and update the PR.

@bedroge bedroge changed the title {numlib,phys}[foss/2020b] Geant4 v10.7.1, CLHEP v2.4.4.0 {numlib,phys}[GCC/10.2.0] Geant4 v10.7.1, CLHEP v2.4.4.0 Apr 7, 2021
@bedroge
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Apr 7, 2021

@migueldiascosta done, seems to work fine.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@migueldiascosta: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=12541 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_12541 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 16506

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 815382792 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/37adba79196b0078d63bf5c134e94a4c for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Going in, thanks @bedroge!

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta merged commit 32dd075 into easybuilders:develop Apr 8, 2021
@bedroge bedroge deleted the 20210407093628_new_pr_Geant41071 branch April 8, 2021 06:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants