Skip to content

{lib}[GCCcore/10.3.0] UCX-CUDA v1.10.0#13260

Merged
boegel merged 4 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Micket:20210626045822_new_pr_UCX-CUDA1100
Jun 28, 2021
Merged

{lib}[GCCcore/10.3.0] UCX-CUDA v1.10.0#13260
boegel merged 4 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Micket:20210626045822_new_pr_UCX-CUDA1100

Conversation

@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Micket Micket commented Jun 26, 2021

(created using eb --new-pr)

Draft'ish. Depends on new easyblock

… patches: UCX-CUDA-1.10.0_link_against_existing_UCX_libs.patch
@boegelbot

This comment has been minimized.

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/u/UCX-CUDA/UCX-CUDA-1.10.0-GCCcore-10.3.0-CUDA-11.3.1.eb Outdated
@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Micket commented Jun 27, 2021

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=2491"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=13260 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=2491" /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13260 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 17629

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 869170865 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Micket commented Jun 27, 2021

Test report by @Micket
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2491
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis-c1 - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/dcf41d0a091c730fd0a1167f777b6528 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2491
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f9b6e21356ed84d871e266791461e160 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Jun 28, 2021

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=2491"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=13260 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=2491" /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13260 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 17631

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 869428303 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2491
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/e59192354fb47fc429b15eb337116333 for a full test report.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Jun 28, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Jun 28, 2021

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2491
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3517.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/01342f113f2c5e0014fbc17cf611d2a9 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Jun 28, 2021

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2491
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node2603.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/eba3755bac7d07fdf0b057e65550d22c for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2491
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
centos8-eb - Linux centos linux 8.3.2011, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700 CPU @ 3.20GHz (skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/7384e931f7936c48122b0ea249388b9f for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2491
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
rocky8-eb - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6900K CPU @ 3.20GHz (broadwell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/3b1b1a6199c816881c8718458aeb0079 for a full test report.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Jun 28, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Jun 28, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3615.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/82d82478c8e80a0b3971b2bc36cd3aad for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Jun 28, 2021

Going in, thanks @Micket!

@boegel boegel merged commit 9b15130 into easybuilders:develop Jun 28, 2021
@Micket Micket deleted the 20210626045822_new_pr_UCX-CUDA1100 branch April 21, 2023 12:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants