{tools}[GCC/4.9.2] mixed bag of utilities + deps (REVIEW)#1369
{tools}[GCC/4.9.2] mixed bag of utilities + deps (REVIEW)#1369boegel merged 30 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Conversation
gjbex
commented
Feb 3, 2015
- S-Lang
- GLib
- libffi
- XZ
- Coreutils
- mc
- libevent
- tmux
- mawk
- libtool
- gettext
|
Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this? |
|
Test report by @gjbex |
|
ok to test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
out of curiosity: why do you want/need this? This will be installed by default on most distro's?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
minimal required version for something else, maybe?
or just because we can, there doesn't need to be a reason ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It was not installed by me for 2014a, I could check with Martijn, but I'm pretty sure it was installed for the bioinformatics guys. They tend to want to use the latest shell tools, and sometimes they even have a very valid reason to do so ;)
|
Test FAILed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
drop comment, easily gets out of sync with version (and doesn't even match with what's below)
|
@gjbex: Jenkins isn't happy yet, two issues: |
include pkg-config as build dep for mc
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @rjeschmi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
typo here...
should be (see %(version_major_minor)s, missing ()
source_urls = ['https://sourceforge.net/projects/levent/files/%(name)s/%(name)s-%(version_major_minor)s/']|
Test report by @rjeschmi |
fix source_urls for libevent
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Test report by @rjeschmi |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @rjeschmi |
|
is there a missing ncurses dependency on tmux? |
|
@rjeschmi: that's possible; can you test yourself whether including |
adding ncurses dep
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @rjeschmi |
|
that FAIL is success, just intel failing and we haven't got an easy way to filter for foss only. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hmm, hold on... just noticed this
@gjbex: shouldn't we be using a bare Python which was built with only GCC/4.9.2 here instead?
Having a dependency using a full toolchain in something that uses a compiler-only toolchain is a little bit weird...
use bare Python as a build dep for GLib
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Going in, for real now. Thanks again to everyone who was a part of this! |
{tools}[GCC/4.9.2] mixed bag of utilities + deps (REVIEW)