Skip to content

{tools}[GCC/4.9.2] mixed bag of utilities + deps (REVIEW)#1369

Merged
boegel merged 30 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
hpcleuven:feature/utils
Mar 31, 2015
Merged

{tools}[GCC/4.9.2] mixed bag of utilities + deps (REVIEW)#1369
boegel merged 30 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
hpcleuven:feature/utils

Conversation

@gjbex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gjbex gjbex commented Feb 3, 2015

  • S-Lang
  • GLib
  • libffi
  • XZ
  • Coreutils
  • mc
  • libevent
  • tmux
  • mawk
  • libtool
  • gettext

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

@gjbex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gjbex commented Feb 3, 2015

Test report by @gjbex
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux red hat enterprise linux computenode 6.4, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz, Python 2.7.6
See https://gist.github.com/0715c27ca2aa58961893 for a full test report.

@gjbex gjbex changed the title {tools}[GCC/4.9.2] mixed bag of utilities + deps (WIP) {tools}[GCC/4.9.2] mixed bag of utilities + deps (REVIEW) Feb 4, 2015
@wpoely86
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

wpoely86 commented Feb 4, 2015

ok to test

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

out of curiosity: why do you want/need this? This will be installed by default on most distro's?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minimal required version for something else, maybe?

or just because we can, there doesn't need to be a reason ;)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was not installed by me for 2014a, I could check with Martijn, but I'm pretty sure it was installed for the bioinformatics guys. They tend to want to use the latest shell tools, and sometimes they even have a very valid reason to do so ;)

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test FAILed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

drop comment, easily gets out of sync with version (and doesn't even match with what's below)

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Feb 4, 2015

@gjbex: Jenkins isn't happy yet, two issues:

Irresolvable dependencies encountered: gettext/0.19.4-GCC-4.9.2, S-Lang/2.3.0-GCC-4.9.2'
AssertionError: Filename '.../S-Lang-2030-GCC-4.9.2.eb' of parsed easconfig matches expected filename 'S-Lang-2.3.0-GCC-4.9.2.eb'

include pkg-config as build dep for mc
@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2719/
Test PASSed.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Mar 30, 2015

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 7 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/33ddfcea7f72e6c9f956 for a full test report.

@rjeschmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test report by @rjeschmi
FAILED
Build succeeded for 8 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5440 @ 2.83GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/0a67203e4e520ef7e7a7 for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo here...

should be (see %(version_major_minor)s, missing ()

source_urls = ['https://sourceforge.net/projects/levent/files/%(name)s/%(name)s-%(version_major_minor)s/']

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed in hpcleuven#6

@rjeschmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test report by @rjeschmi
FAILED
Build succeeded for 8 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5440 @ 2.83GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/1c44a1ea1abf6f370c1b for a full test report.

fix source_urls for libevent
@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2722/
Test PASSed.

@rjeschmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test report by @rjeschmi
FAILED
Build succeeded for 8 out of 18 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5440 @ 2.83GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/08234b7795b60ee49d21 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Mar 30, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/ca0354fc6a8f3ae28aed for a full test report.

@rjeschmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test report by @rjeschmi
FAILED
Build succeeded for 18 out of 27 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5440 @ 2.83GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/ca1237426fc6d0d4bcaf for a full test report.

@rjeschmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

is there a missing ncurses dependency on tmux?

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Mar 30, 2015

@rjeschmi: that's possible; can you test yourself whether including ncurses as a dep for tmux fixes the problem on your end?

@rjeschmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@boegel @gjbex PR with the ncurses dep, seemed to solve my issue on tmux. Otherwise, other errors are intel related

hpcleuven#7

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2728/
Test PASSed.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Mar 31, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/cab871f4171cefc100dd for a full test report.

@rjeschmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test report by @rjeschmi
FAILED
Build succeeded for 20 out of 28 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5440 @ 2.83GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/d9430aa410314d0f79bc for a full test report.

@rjeschmi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

that FAIL is success, just intel failing and we haven't got an easy way to filter for foss only.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Mar 31, 2015

@rjeschmi: ok, thanks for clarifying that

Going in, thanks @gjbex, and @wpoely86 and @rjeschmi for testing/reviewing!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, hold on... just noticed this

@gjbex: shouldn't we be using a bare Python which was built with only GCC/4.9.2 here instead?

Having a dependency using a full toolchain in something that uses a compiler-only toolchain is a little bit weird...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed with hpcleuven#8 (and GLib build still works)

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2730/
Test PASSed.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Mar 31, 2015

Going in, for real now. Thanks again to everyone who was a part of this!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2015
{tools}[GCC/4.9.2] mixed bag of utilities + deps (REVIEW)
@boegel boegel merged commit 759f63c into easybuilders:develop Mar 31, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants