Skip to content

{data}[fosscuda/2020b] Mish-Cuda v20210309 w/ Python 3.8.6#13759

Merged
branfosj merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Micket:20210817173235_new_pr_Mish-Cuda20210309
Aug 21, 2021
Merged

{data}[fosscuda/2020b] Mish-Cuda v20210309 w/ Python 3.8.6#13759
branfosj merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Micket:20210817173235_new_pr_Mish-Cuda20210309

Conversation

@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Micket Micket commented Aug 17, 2021

(created using eb --new-pr)

@Micket Micket added the new label Aug 17, 2021
@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Micket commented Aug 17, 2021

Test report by @Micket
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis-c1 - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/e863305c7eacf6b407f5d2665bdec645 for a full test report.

@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Micket commented Aug 17, 2021

@bogelbot pleases test @ generoso

@Micket Micket added this to the 4.x milestone Aug 17, 2021
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@branfosj branfosj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@branfosj branfosj modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.4.2?) Aug 21, 2021
@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bber0501u03a.bb2.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.3, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/869bd5ad9201eecb52dcbf6c22ceb784 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Going in, thanks @Micket!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit a75e826 into easybuilders:develop Aug 21, 2021
@Micket Micket deleted the 20210817173235_new_pr_Mish-Cuda20210309 branch April 21, 2023 11:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants