add additional valid checksum for lhs 1.1.1 extension in recent R 4.0.x and 4.1.0 easyconfigs#13969
Merged
boegel merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom Sep 11, 2021
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
This isn't the first time, and it won't be the last time... As usual, there's actually no code changes at all, the only difference in the files included in the new source tarball is the publication date: Therefore, it makes sense to keep accepting both the old and the new SHA256 checksum, since it doesn't really matter which source tarball you use. |
boegel
requested changes
Sep 10, 2021
boegel
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2021
Member
|
Test report by @boegel |
Member
|
Going in, thanks @guimou! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When trying to build R 4.1.0 I found that the checksum for the lhs v1.1.1 extension was wrong.
I corrected with the right checksum (build tested and working) for all its occurences.
Don't know what happened, maybe they repackaged/replaced the source at some point...