Skip to content

{lib}[intel/2015a] Hoard 3.10 (REVIEW)#1415

Merged
boegel merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:Hoard
Feb 23, 2015
Merged

{lib}[intel/2015a] Hoard 3.10 (REVIEW)#1415
boegel merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:Hoard

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented Feb 23, 2015

@stdweird: please review?

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Feb 23, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/a381a19a8359319b452d for a full test report.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2371/
Test PASSed.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Feb 23, 2015

@wpoely86: please review?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add empty newline

@wpoely86
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

looks fine

@boegel boegel changed the title add easyconfig + patch for Hoard {lib}[intel/2015a] Hoard 3.10 (REVIEW) Feb 23, 2015
@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2373/
Test PASSed.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Feb 23, 2015

Thanks for the review @wpoely86!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2015
{lib}[intel/2015a] Hoard 3.10 (REVIEW)
@boegel boegel merged commit b73b59e into easybuilders:develop Feb 23, 2015
@boegel boegel deleted the Hoard branch February 23, 2015 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants