Skip to content

fix incorrect module load message and update morphology plugin of ImageJ 1.51k#14152

Merged
lexming merged 3 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20211014150320_new_pr_ImageJ151k
Oct 16, 2021
Merged

fix incorrect module load message and update morphology plugin of ImageJ 1.51k#14152
lexming merged 3 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20211014150320_new_pr_ImageJ151k

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented Oct 14, 2021

(created using eb --new-pr)
cfr. #9197 (comment)

@lexming
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lexming commented Oct 15, 2021

Test report by @lexming
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node300.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/c7cb681ed0dcea00f5f52c14c9105efb for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lexming lexming left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@boegel The morphology plugin from http://www.mecourse.com/landinig/software/ does not exist any more. Should we update this easyconfig to use the same morphology plugin as ImageJ-1.52q-Java-1.8.eb? At first sight it should work with this version of ImageJ as well.

@lexming lexming added this to the 4.x milestone Oct 16, 2021
@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel The morphology plugin from http://www.mecourse.com/landinig/software/ does not exist any more. Should we update this easyconfig to use the same morphology plugin as ImageJ-1.52q-Java-1.8.eb? At first sight it should work with this version of ImageJ as well.

That makes sense to me, but with the suggested alteration I've put in #14163 to allow us to have it 'versioned' by using the git hash.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Oct 16, 2021

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.5.0?) Oct 16, 2021
@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=14152 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_14152 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 7097

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 944886467 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cnx2 - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/03c185e52577c64632916646310c9924 for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lexming commented Oct 16, 2021

Test report by @lexming
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node300.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/37d88a87f0efaaaef79b687c593ffc7c for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lexming lexming left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lexming lexming changed the title fix incorrect module load message for ImageJ 1.51k fix incorrect module load message and update morphology plugin of ImageJ 1.51k Oct 16, 2021
@lexming
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lexming commented Oct 16, 2021

Going in, thanks @boegel !

@lexming lexming merged commit 96c681d into easybuilders:develop Oct 16, 2021
@boegel boegel deleted the 20211014150320_new_pr_ImageJ151k branch October 18, 2021 12:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants