Skip to content

{devel}[foss/2021a] arosics v1.7.6 w/ Python 3.9.5#15249

Merged
jfgrimm merged 4 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
robert-mijakovic:20220405191623_new_pr_arosics176
Apr 28, 2022
Merged

{devel}[foss/2021a] arosics v1.7.6 w/ Python 3.9.5#15249
jfgrimm merged 4 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
robert-mijakovic:20220405191623_new_pr_arosics176

Conversation

@robert-mijakovic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@robert-mijakovic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Test report by @robert-mijakovic
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
mel0410 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7H12 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/3b374cb031dcef26ae6087435cb4b728 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm jfgrimm added the new label Apr 6, 2022
@jfgrimm jfgrimm added this to the 4.x milestone Apr 6, 2022
@jfgrimm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jfgrimm commented Apr 6, 2022

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=15249 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15249 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8359

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1090119137 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/4a95fdc9aee6d188ed096f50d0131f38 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jfgrimm commented Apr 6, 2022

Test report by @jfgrimm
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node094.pri.viking.alces.network - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/1e29633266cb244f1e630973eeeaf083 for a full test report.

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/a/arosics/arosics-1.7.6-foss-2021a.eb Outdated
@jfgrimm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jfgrimm commented Apr 28, 2022

@boegelbot: please test @ jsc-zen2

@jfgrimm jfgrimm modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.5.5?) Apr 28, 2022
@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=15249 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15249 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 1147

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1112328852 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f208861c2659cdd025c716500d0297ca for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jfgrimm jfgrimm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jfgrimm commented Apr 28, 2022

Going in, thanks @robert-mijakovic!

@jfgrimm jfgrimm merged commit cabdc6b into easybuilders:develop Apr 28, 2022
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Jun 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants