Skip to content

add easyconfig for networkx#1592

Merged
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:networkx
May 11, 2015
Merged

add easyconfig for networkx#1592
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:networkx

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented May 11, 2015

No description provided.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented May 11, 2015

@wpoely86: quick review?

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented May 11, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/8c1cf71576f1aac011d9 for a full test report.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2945/
Test PASSed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we should start looking into simplifying this for PythonPackage easyblock? In principle, only the python version should be specified.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you open a separate issue for that (or a PR ;-)) in the easyblocks repo?

@wpoely86
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

looks good

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented May 11, 2015

Thanks for the review @wpoely86!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request May 11, 2015
add easyconfig for networkx
@boegel boegel merged commit 57f6283 into easybuilders:develop May 11, 2015
@boegel boegel deleted the networkx branch May 11, 2015 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants