replace HDF5 v1.13.1 with v1.12.2 as dependency, since we shouldn't use odd minor versions of HDF5 which are not stable releases#16153
Conversation
|
I also dropped the dap4 tests for netCDF as they were previously failing for me while trying to access online resources. Even if that site is back, i don't think we want to rely on tests that access internet as I imagine it causes annoying failures for those building on internet-less nodes. |
|
This is so inconveniently big, I'll do test reports in batches |
|
Test report by @Micket |
…asyconfigs into 20220829133002_new_pr_h5py370
|
Test report by @Micket |
|
Test report by @Micket |
|
Test report by @Micket |
|
Test report by @Micket edit: I think this fail was because i managed to have built some dependency with Icelake arch in my test tree and this was a skylake node i tested from. Ugh. |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 1233335706 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @branfosj |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Going in, thanks @Micket! |
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2 |
|
@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 1363247366 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
(created using
eb --new-pr)Odd releases are just RCs apparently.