{bio} [intel-2014b] SOBAcl (REVIEW) by backelj · Pull Request #1658 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

backelj · 2015-06-03T10:15:21Z

Needed to fix two Easyconfig files to install SOBA.

…2.3.2') because of sanity check

hpcugentbot · 2015-06-03T10:15:23Z

Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

boegel · 2015-06-03T10:16:12Z

Jenkins: ok to test

hpcugentbot · 2015-06-03T10:28:52Z

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3259/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3259/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-06-03T11:11:48Z

@backelj: PR subject doesn't match contents? Please clarify?

backelj · 2015-06-03T11:19:27Z

What's wrong? As said, we needed to make the committed changes to the two Easyconfig files.
The goal is to install SOBA but we don't have an Easyconfig file for this yet.

boegel · 2015-06-03T11:50:40Z

Well, there's nothing wrong, except that the title is misleading. ;-)

Can you fix the source_urls in the other Qt 4.8.6 easyconfigs too, so they're kept in sync?

…aphviz

hpcugentbot · 2015-06-03T13:40:39Z

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3311/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3311/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-06-03T13:44:38Z

@backelj: Can you mark this PR as WIP until you consider it ready for consumption?

See also https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild/wiki/Policy-for-easyconfig-pull-requests (I need to promote that more clearly).

hpcugentbot · 2015-06-03T13:45:08Z

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3314/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3314/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

backelj · 2015-06-03T13:52:00Z

@boegel: we are still learning here ;-)
I updated the PR title to include (WIP), is that okay?
Now I'm just waiting for an answer to my question on the mailing list about whether or not to include the toolchain name for the SOBAcl module before I commit it, and then it should be final... or ready for (REVIEW) that is :-)

hpcugentbot · 2015-06-04T11:42:17Z

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3413/
Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3413/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-06-04T11:55:17Z

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3414/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3414/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-06-04T18:35:52Z

@backelj: test report submitted

Just one question: any particular reason you guys are still stuck on intel/2014b?

boegel · 2015-06-04T19:40:05Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 5 out of 8 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/3780598eacb58ade88f8 for a full test report.

backelj · 2015-06-04T22:26:53Z

@boegel: We were unable to compile one of these modules with intel-2015a. We got an internal error which Intel has fixed for their 2016 release (currently in test).

hpcugentbot · 2015-06-04T22:26:59Z

Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

hpcugentbot · 2015-06-04T22:29:50Z

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3419/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3419/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-06-04T23:00:07Z

@backelj: what kind of internal error? Try building with -O0 via toolchainopts = {'noopt': True}, to see if you can maybe dance around it by lowering the optimisation level? If -O0 doesn't work, you're in trouble though.

backelj · 2015-06-05T06:09:02Z

@boegel: the kind of error that Intel confirmed :-)

backelj · 2015-06-05T16:21:52Z

Test report by @backelj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 46 out of 46 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/9ccd5d889b843b6119da for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-06-05T16:23:03Z

Jenkins: test this please

boegel · 2015-06-05T16:23:18Z

@backelj: that last test report is... impressive :)

hpcugentbot · 2015-06-05T16:28:29Z

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3442/
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/3442/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-06-05T16:37:43Z

@backelj: we prefer keeping easyconfigs in sync across toolchains; are you up for opening a separate PR to update the other two Perl 5.20.0 easyconfigs too?

boegel · 2015-06-05T19:40:43Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/e46b25ecf05955fc5fce for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-06-05T21:46:38Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/7e6c9599106a24d9d4ee for a full test report.

backelj · 2015-06-08T11:28:56Z

@boegel: I don't get the two last reports.... The first one says it can build Pango, the second one doesn't with the error being "C compiler cannot create executables". They are run on the same system, right?

I can see one other difference: the first one uses /gpfs/scratch/users/vsc400, the second one /vscmnt/gent_vulpix/_/user/home/gent/vsc4000...

What's wrong?

boegel · 2015-06-08T11:31:59Z

@backelj: these tests were probably run on an unstable framework branch, I'll need to retest them (but can't right now, our systems are down for maintenance)

Maybe @wpoely86 can fire a test for this, if he still has foss/2014b available?

boegel · 2015-06-08T11:32:44Z

Just for completeness sake, I had easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1294 installed when testing this, and it seems like there still are some issues with that change (I ran into similar problems in #1337, I think).

wpoely86 · 2015-06-08T14:21:52Z

@backelj please do not use a / in the name of a branch. It causes trouble.

wpoely86 · 2015-06-08T17:48:23Z

Test report by @wpoely86
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 45 out of 45 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux debian 7.8, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz, Python 2.7.3
See https://gist.github.com/d1913b2c04b49c915514 for a full test report.

backelj · 2015-06-11T13:49:17Z

@boegel: Is there anything that needs to be done here?

boegel · 2015-06-18T07:03:57Z

@backelj: it should be good to go, but I want to get a successful test report from my end too first (which is troublesome right now)

I don't expect any problems, since the test already passed on both SL6 and Debian...

boegel · 2015-06-18T15:28:38Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 47 out of 47 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux RHEL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/f3ecc6410ac049ab32d1 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-06-18T15:42:39Z

Alrighty, going in, thanks for tackling this @backelj!

{bio} [intel-2014b] SOBAcl (REVIEW)

CalcUA Core Facility added 2 commits June 3, 2015 12:07

- Pango-1.36.7-intel-2014b.eb : added missing dependency ('libXft', '…

ee063cc

…2.3.2') because of sanity check

- Qt-4.8.6-intel-2014b.eb : updated source_urls

fc0c5c7

CalcUA Core Facility added 2 commits June 3, 2015 15:31

- Perl-5.20.0-intel-2014b.eb : added some extensions (needed for SOBA)

c9dc018

- GraphViz-2.18-intel-2014b-Perl-5.20.0.eb : new Perl interface to Gr…

cac43de

…aphviz

backelj changed the title ~~Modules/soba~~ Modules/soba (WIP) Jun 3, 2015

- SOBAcl-r18-intel-2014b-Perl-5.20.0.eb : added EasyConfig for SOBAcl

6dab59b

- moved file

96abaf3

backelj changed the title ~~Modules/soba (WIP)~~ Modules/soba (REVIEW) Jun 4, 2015

- fixed typo in source_urls for SQL::Abstract

04f0dfd

backelj closed this Jun 4, 2015

backelj reopened this Jun 4, 2015

backelj changed the title ~~Modules/soba (REVIEW)~~ {bio} [intel-2014b] SOBAcl (REVIEW) Jun 5, 2015

Merge remote branch 'upstream/develop' into modules/soba

0f48903

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2015

Merge pull request #1658 from hpcuantwerpen/modules/soba

14b2380

{bio} [intel-2014b] SOBAcl (REVIEW)

boegel merged commit 14b2380 into easybuilders:develop Jun 18, 2015

backelj deleted the modules/soba branch October 6, 2015 13:47

Conversation

backelj commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

backelj commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

backelj commented Jun 3, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jun 4, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jun 4, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 4, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 4, 2015

Uh oh!

backelj commented Jun 4, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jun 4, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jun 4, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 4, 2015

Uh oh!

backelj commented Jun 5, 2015

Uh oh!

backelj commented Jun 5, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 5, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 5, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jun 5, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 5, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 5, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 5, 2015

Uh oh!

backelj commented Jun 8, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 8, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 8, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Jun 8, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Jun 8, 2015

Uh oh!

backelj commented Jun 11, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 18, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 18, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jun 18, 2015

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!