Skip to content

{bio}[GCC/11.3.0] MView v1.67#18198

Merged
branfosj merged 5 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
buzh:20230626150202_new_pr_MView167
Jul 2, 2023
Merged

{bio}[GCC/11.3.0] MView v1.67#18198
branfosj merged 5 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
buzh:20230626150202_new_pr_MView167

Conversation

@buzh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@buzh buzh commented Jun 26, 2023

(created using eb --new-pr)

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/m/MView/MView-1.67-foss-2022a-Perl-5.34.1.eb Outdated
@jfgrimm jfgrimm added this to the 4.x milestone Jun 26, 2023
@jfgrimm jfgrimm added the new label Jun 26, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@buzh buzh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, good to know

boegel
boegel previously requested changes Jun 27, 2023
Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/m/MView/MView-1.67-foss-2022a-Perl-5.34.1.eb Outdated
Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/m/MView/MView-1.67-foss-2022a-Perl-5.34.1.eb
@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@buzh: Tests failed in GitHub Actions, see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/actions/runs/5387634076
Output from first failing test suite run:

FAIL: test_pr_sha256_checksums (test.easyconfigs.easyconfigs.EasyConfigTest)
Make sure changed easyconfigs have SHA256 checksums in place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/runner/work/easybuild-easyconfigs/easybuild-easyconfigs/test/easyconfigs/easyconfigs.py", line 989, in test_pr_sha256_checksums
    self.assertTrue(len(checksum_issues) == 0, "No checksum issues:\n%s" % '\n'.join(checksum_issues))
AssertionError: False is not true : No checksum issues:
Checksums missing for one or more sources/patches in MView-1.67-GCC-11.3.0.eb: found 1 sources + 0 patches vs 0 checksums

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 17442 tests in 743.896s

FAILED (failures=1)
ERROR: Not all tests were successful

bleep, bloop, I'm just a bot (boegelbot v20200716.01)
Please talk to my owner @boegel if you notice me acting stupid),
or submit a pull request to https://github.com/boegel/boegelbot fix the problem.

@branfosj branfosj changed the title {bio}[foss/2022a] MView v1.67 {bio}[GCC/11.3.0] MView v1.67 Jul 2, 2023
Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/m/MView/MView-1.67-GCC-11.3.0.eb
Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/m/MView/MView-1.67-GCC-11.3.0.eb Outdated
@branfosj branfosj modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.7.3?) Jul 2, 2023
@branfosj branfosj dismissed boegel’s stale review July 2, 2023 09:44

changes made

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

branfosj commented Jul 2, 2023

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/8c45ec91bd4d0ba7c0714fa7f4c246f3 for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj dismissed jfgrimm’s stale review July 2, 2023 09:44

changes made

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

branfosj commented Jul 2, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=18198 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_18198 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 11194

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1616543137 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/2128c00129e50fef896d266dd1985b78 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

branfosj commented Jul 2, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=18198 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_18198 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 2943

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1616554842 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/bd811a5ecb5f9773f05795a3b480d3cd for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

branfosj commented Jul 2, 2023

Going in, thanks @buzh!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit 220adbe into easybuilders:develop Jul 2, 2023
@buzh buzh deleted the 20230626150202_new_pr_MView167 branch July 2, 2023 10:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants