Skip to content

{bio}[GCCcore/12.2.0] Hybpiper v2.1.6, DIAMOND v2.1.8, parallel v20230722, ...#18414

Merged
casparvl merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
PetrKralCZ:20230728170507_new_pr_Hybpiper216
Jul 31, 2023
Merged

{bio}[GCCcore/12.2.0] Hybpiper v2.1.6, DIAMOND v2.1.8, parallel v20230722, ...#18414
casparvl merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
PetrKralCZ:20230728170507_new_pr_Hybpiper216

Conversation

@PetrKralCZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

(created using eb --new-pr)

…2.2.0.eb, parallel-20230722-GCCcore-12.2.0.eb, psutil-5.9.5-GCCcore-12.2.0.eb
@PetrKralCZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@PetrKralCZ
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Test report by @PetrKralCZ
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node4003.donphan.os - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240 CPU @ 2.60GHz, 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A2, 530.30.02, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/PetrKralCZ/8ae0768bdd0140167cfbbdcbf133e5bc for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@PetrKralCZ: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=18414 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_18414 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 11307

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1655883605 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/7b70a4876a307d435daf57faf094c4c6 for a full test report.

@casparvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=18414 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_18414 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3036

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1658716111 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@casparvl casparvl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

EasyConfigs look good to me. Awaiting test build, if that succeeds, it can be merged.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (4 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/fd8744ac81deac40a001433ab0ad9459 for a full test report.

@casparvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test report by @casparvl
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 13 out of 13 (4 easyconfigs in total)
tcn464.local.snellius.surf.nl - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7H12 64-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/casparvl/0575563147bc12b690d00a5b9f728df2 for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@casparvl casparvl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm!

@casparvl casparvl added this to the next release (4.8.1?) milestone Jul 31, 2023
@casparvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Going in, thanks @PetrKralCZ!

@casparvl casparvl merged commit 114d283 into easybuilders:develop Jul 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants