Skip to content

{tools}[GCCcore/11.3.0] jedi v0.18.1, jedi-language-server v0.39.0#19269

Merged
verdurin merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
jose-d:20231120155659_new_pr_jedi0181
Nov 21, 2023
Merged

{tools}[GCCcore/11.3.0] jedi v0.18.1, jedi-language-server v0.39.0#19269
verdurin merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
jose-d:20231120155659_new_pr_jedi0181

Conversation

@jose-d
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jose-d jose-d commented Nov 20, 2023

(created using eb --new-pr)

jedi-language-server + its dep, jedi, possibly useful when running Jupyter-* from easybuild-generated modules..

@jose-d
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jose-d commented Nov 20, 2023

Test report by @jose-d
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
gpu1.phoebe.lan - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8 (Green Obsidian), x86_64, AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor, 8 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-80GB, 535.129.03, Python 3.11.2
See https://gist.github.com/jose-d/fef9db73e21d1622fcaa5a58737f4fa2 for a full test report.

@verdurin verdurin added the new label Nov 21, 2023
@verdurin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19269 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19269 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 12199

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1820542411 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@verdurin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (2 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/verdurin/ca7c6b0949a8c23b9727c1caa4cd2e30 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cns3 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/d669ac57fb6b7013ab68d49636e179a4 for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@verdurin verdurin added this to the next release (4.9.0?) milestone Nov 21, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@verdurin verdurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=19269 EB_ARGS= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_19269 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3767

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1820553516 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/775c0bdd73546c2fcc80d7ec8f6005b3 for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Going in, thanks @jose-d!

@verdurin verdurin merged commit e48db9e into easybuilders:develop Nov 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants