Skip to content

link to xxHash library provided via EasyBuild in python-xxhash v3.2.0#19432

Merged
branfosj merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
lexming:20231215110613_new_pr_python-xxhash320
Dec 16, 2023
Merged

link to xxHash library provided via EasyBuild in python-xxhash v3.2.0#19432
branfosj merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
lexming:20231215110613_new_pr_python-xxhash320

Conversation

@lexming
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lexming lexming commented Dec 15, 2023

(created using eb --new-pr)

This is already the case in python-xxhash-3.1.0-GCCcore-11.3.0.eb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@smoors smoors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@lexming
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

lexming commented Dec 15, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=19432 EB_ARGS= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_19432 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3914

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1857678893 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/d9dd1dfdf9382ec753a9759f219bfe8f for a full test report.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Dec 15, 2023
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Dec 15, 2023
@lexming
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

lexming commented Dec 15, 2023

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19432 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19432 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 12420

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1858483699 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/c90223c8a21235c2b022e6d33a63a063 for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj added this to the next release (4.9.0?) milestone Dec 16, 2023
@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/f805cda548cddbe2a1db6aea67b31d42 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Going in, thanks @lexming!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit 020c19d into easybuilders:develop Dec 16, 2023
@lexming lexming deleted the 20231215110613_new_pr_python-xxhash320 branch December 18, 2023 09:54
@boegel boegel changed the title link to xxHash library from EB in python-xxhash-3.2.0-GCCcore-12.2.0.eb link to xxHash library provided via EasyBuild in python-xxhash v3.2.0 Dec 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants