@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@migueldiascosta: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19983 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19983 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 12980

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/2d612cf3ea8c5d5dea6a02eeade2b994 for a full test report.

if this is required specifically for toolchain version 2023a, with OpenEXR 3.1.7, lgtm

it looks like the python bindings are included in OpenEXR itself from version 3.2.0, so an easyconfig for PyEXR using that toolchain version could probably be simplified (but I suppose that would also require adding e.g. -DOPENEXR_BUILD_PYTHON=ON to the existing OpenEXR-3.2.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb easyconfig)

@migueldiascosta I actually tried doing exactly that (adding -DOPENEXR_BUILD_PYTHON=ON to the GCCcore/13.2.0 based ec) and... didn't end up with any python bindings in the OpenEXR install dir.

@jfgrimm looks like stills are still in flux (AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr#1629)

what about leaving a comment for whoever picks up on PyEXR later to look into using the python bindings from OpenEXR (3.2.3?) itself?

@jfgrimm thoughts on Miguel's suggestion?

@migueldiascosta @verdurin good idea, done

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/verdurin/c227bc8d8c6b5f32d4febc2955cd6720 for a full test report.

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19983 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19983 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 13347

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/b5608a5c999000ea2208ec05ff464d2f for a full test report.

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@verdurin: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=19983 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19983 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 4023

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/478fe1079f0403eba1b29867dc0d5959 for a full test report.

Going in, thanks @jfgrimm!