Skip to content

Remove Jasper dependency and configure option from GDAL 3.5+#20009

Merged
jfgrimm merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Flamefire:20240301133948_new_pr_GDAL202
Mar 1, 2024
Merged

Remove Jasper dependency and configure option from GDAL 3.5+#20009
jfgrimm merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Flamefire:20240301133948_new_pr_GDAL202

Conversation

@Flamefire
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@Flamefire
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Test report by @Flamefire
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
n1416 - Linux RHEL 8.7 (Ootpa), x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8470 (icelake), Python 3.8.13
See https://gist.github.com/Flamefire/5d7c80f6ecf7e1a29aad189870eba335 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024

Test report by @jfgrimm
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
himem01.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/517a764ea443a09b1e40d8f35da85e8e for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@jfgrimm jfgrimm added the bug fix label Mar 1, 2024
@jfgrimm jfgrimm added this to the release after 4.9.0 milestone Mar 1, 2024
@jfgrimm jfgrimm self-assigned this Mar 1, 2024
@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20009 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20009 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13008

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1973523005 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/c80751598d7ef02ff8639d9c13dc4eeb for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ jsc-zen3
CORE_CNT=16

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20009 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20009 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3709

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1973672029 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c2.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/9d94f0f4b06636dc76c54b217e3bd57f for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jfgrimm jfgrimm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can't believe I'm getting removed, but lgtm

@jfgrimm jfgrimm merged commit 12f1f73 into easybuilders:develop Mar 1, 2024
@jfgrimm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jfgrimm commented Mar 1, 2024

Going in, thanks @Flamefire!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants