Test report by @Micket
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
vera-gpu1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6130 CPU @ 2.10GHz, 1 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/Micket/ba7705f0f72840c4ad9cdda870d2cdc6 for a full test report.

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/2aea65e4d95c34ebc336fd335cf55af4 for a full test report.

Test report by @Micket
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
vera-gpu1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6130 CPU @ 2.10GHz, 1 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/Micket/31667f71e3d1ab69de058e019b774fcc for a full test report.

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20083 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20083 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 13076

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cns3 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/0f585e8ac220d17a68720f1f241480ed for a full test report.

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/verdurin/d3cd1fc271af3f77078bd6e6a3c733e6 for a full test report.

Going in, thanks @branfosj!

@branfosj Does this mean that easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3088 isn't working as intended?

@branfosj Does this mean that easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3088 isn't working as intended?

It is not picking the newest for me and it is not picking the first in the path. Based on the below tests, easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3088 has broken this for me.

Correct Python:

• Without this PR and without tweak CMakeMake easyblock apply CMake policy to select python based on $PATH order, instead of highest Python version easybuild-easyblocks#3088
• With this PR and without tweak CMakeMake easyblock apply CMake policy to select python based on $PATH order, instead of highest Python version easybuild-easyblocks#3088
• With this PR and with tweak CMakeMake easyblock apply CMake policy to select python based on $PATH order, instead of highest Python version easybuild-easyblocks#3088

-- Found Python: /rds/projects/2017/branfosj-rse/easybuild/EL8-ice/software/Python/3.11.3-GCCcore-12.3.0/bin/python3.11 (found version "3.11.3") found components: Interpreter Development Development.Module Development.Embed

Incorrect Python:

• Without this PR and with tweak CMakeMake easyblock apply CMake policy to select python based on $PATH order, instead of highest Python version easybuild-easyblocks#3088

-- Found Python: /rds/projects/2017/branfosj-rse/easybuild/venv-dev-EL8/bin/python3 (found version "3.6.8") found components: Interpreter Development Development.Module Development.Embed

$PATH just before calling cmake has /rds/projects/2017/branfosj-rse/easybuild/EL8-ice/software/Python/3.11.3-GCCcore-12.3.0/bin before /rds/projects/2017/branfosj-rse/easybuild/venv-dev-EL8/bin.

@branfosj Can you open an issue on this? Keeping track of things in a merged PR is something we should avoid...