Skip to content

{bio}[foss/2023a] hdWGCNA v0.3.00 w/ R 4.3.2#20124

Merged
branfosj merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20240314183905_new_pr_hdWGCNA0300
Mar 15, 2024
Merged

{bio}[foss/2023a] hdWGCNA v0.3.00 w/ R 4.3.2#20124
branfosj merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20240314183905_new_pr_hdWGCNA0300

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented Mar 14, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

@boegel boegel added the new label Mar 14, 2024
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 14, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3136.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/49a5836483c01b834c7e80eef8e49875 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Mar 14, 2024
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 14, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20124 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20124 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13110

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1998099983 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/h/hdWGCNA/hdWGCNA-0.3.00-foss-2023a-R-4.3.2.eb Outdated
@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/5e66b98ce9857e32459f49d1331f0202 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 14, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20124 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20124 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3778

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 1998199972 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/997e4a89bf624168a67e329589a88b6f for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/35db06016fb2e413661bc2cc30c5b6b8 for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj modified the milestones: 4.x, release after 4.9.0 Mar 15, 2024
@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit 0315600 into easybuilders:develop Mar 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants