Skip to content

add rhandsontable extension to R-bundle-CRAN v2023.12#20614

Merged
smoors merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20240523134736_new_pr_R-bundle-CRAN202312
May 23, 2024
Merged

add rhandsontable extension to R-bundle-CRAN v2023.12#20614
smoors merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20240523134736_new_pr_R-bundle-CRAN202312

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented May 23, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

This removed the dedicated easyconfig for rhandsontable that was contributed by @PetrKralCZ in #20537, I don't see a need to have it standalone as opposed to just including it in the existing R-bundle-CRAN module...

@boegel boegel added this to the release after 4.9.1 milestone May 23, 2024
@boegel boegel requested a review from smoors May 23, 2024 11:52
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented May 23, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--skip"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20614 EB_ARGS="--skip" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20614 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13533

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2126920678 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/554942ac9e307ce8aef31e9342cd0c33 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented May 23, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3147.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/285a7d09be55f6f1c307ad42871d73b5 for a full test report.

@smoors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

smoors commented May 23, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 EB_ARGS="--skip"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20614 EB_ARGS="--skip" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20614 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4190

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2127302323 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/3410e22aa4bdba6606accffefbbe62ce for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@smoors smoors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@smoors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

smoors commented May 23, 2024

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@smoors smoors merged commit ce359bc into easybuilders:develop May 23, 2024
@boegel boegel deleted the 20240523134736_new_pr_R-bundle-CRAN202312 branch May 23, 2024 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants