remove --with-64 from configopts for recent BLAST+ versions#20784
remove --with-64 from configopts for recent BLAST+ versions#20784boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
--with-64 from configopts for recent BLAST+ versions#20784Conversation
|
For reference, I checked the BLAST+ binary tarballs, they contain a file So they don't use |
|
Test report by @bedroge |
|
Successfully tested with the EESSI bot on an Arm node: EESSI/software-layer#599 (comment) |
|
Test report by @bedroge |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
@bedroge: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 2158549508 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 |
|
@bedroge: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 2158561803 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
failed test reports are fallout due to overlapped testing of #20794 |
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 |
|
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 2159076742 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 2159133081 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Going in, thanks @bedroge! |
Compiling BLAST+ on Arm fails in the configure step:
The
--with-64adds-m64to the compiler flags, and this is not supported on Arm (and neither on for instance RISC-V). Without the flag, it just doesn't add-m64(which should be fine too) and I preferred that over having to add if statements for distinguishing between the different architectures.