{toolchain} [GCC/4.9.3] gimkl-2.11.5 by wpoely86 · Pull Request #2093 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

wpoely86 · 2015-10-28T15:30:35Z

Update of the gimkl toolchain with components of intel/2015b toolchain.

boegel · 2015-10-28T15:34:04Z

hmm, maybe a bigger bump is appropriate?

1.5.9 is ancient, and we're bumping the impi from 4.x to 5.x?

also, using .0 leaves no room to downgrade a component later

how about something like

2.2.5 (I know it looks weird and is kind of senseless, but it leaves room to play around with)

a maybe more sensible suggestion:

2.x (major bump because of new major impi)
2.11 (GCC .9 + impi .0 + imkl .2)
2.11.5 (room for downgrading if we need to)

boegel · 2015-10-28T15:34:38Z

@wpoely86: please include an HPL easyconfig with this toolchain too, by means of testcase, and let's see a test report for all this

wpoely86 · 2015-10-28T15:34:59Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/073cb3a082ac64a6920b for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-28T15:37:32Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/19f3b95d2f18ba945a63 for a full test report.

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-28T15:42:06Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4875/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-28T15:47:30Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/285684cbd8c925934ec7 for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-28T15:51:53Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/f8fb65091f4dd1b1a696 for a full test report.

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-28T16:15:14Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4876/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-28T16:58:45Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4878/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-28T17:34:26Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/39f130598a51c373bc57 for a full test report.

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-28T17:40:53Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4879/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-28T20:13:47Z

Test report by @wpoely86
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/6adada4783ed802962a2 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-10-28T20:50:29Z

@wpoely86: good to go if Jenkins agrees

wpoely86 · 2015-10-28T20:50:59Z

@boegel well, no binutils?

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-28T20:51:17Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4880/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-10-28T20:59:05Z

@wpoely86: gimkl has traditionally not included binutils, so it's OK not to

However, I'm definitely not opposing not including it. What's stopping you to include binutils as a dep in the gimkl and gimpi easyconfigs?

boegel · 2015-10-28T21:03:40Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/584189aa4347ee7415c2 for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T08:23:50Z

@boegel I'm not sure which one to include, binutils based on dummy, or a new one based solely on GCC or binutils-2.25-GCC-4.9.3-binutils-2.25?

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-29T12:46:23Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4909/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T12:54:50Z

@boegel please have another look (binutils added), tests are queued.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T13:33:26Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 9 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/663f4267236db19aae7f for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T14:52:58Z

Test report by @wpoely86
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/e8eec13860d9cabb2834 for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T14:53:48Z

Needs easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#727 to build HPL. Toolchain is fine.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T15:50:49Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 9 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/b13b859ee942b62b8ed6 for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T16:05:17Z

Test report by @wpoely86
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/0f9e9d2edc1309719578 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-10-29T16:07:44Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 8 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/8e01721b45637e2792d0 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-10-29T16:10:24Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/b3246d9e6808222c467e for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-10-29T16:20:32Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/3fb1aba6c9ccce1ff2d7 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-10-29T16:22:29Z

Going in, thanks @wpoely86!

{toolchain} [GCC/4.9.3] gimkl-2.11.5

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T18:06:37Z

Test report by @wpoely86
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/db991555069fa3143e33 for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T19:59:23Z

Test report by @wpoely86
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/a57a4f184c37e27b02a9 for a full test report.

wpoely86 added 2 commits October 28, 2015 16:11

Added gimpi-1.6.0 with latest mpi

a3fc8e4

Added gimkl-1.6.0 with the latest MKL

ae7100e

boegel reviewed Oct 28, 2015
View reviewed changes

boegel added this to the v2.4.0 milestone Oct 28, 2015

wpoely86 added 2 commits October 28, 2015 16:38

Version change for gimkl and gimpi

2c6608a

Added HPL for gimkl toolchain

2db7dc6

Update version everywhere!

99fd4f5

Use GCC instead of GNU

b07fb0c

Use -fopenmp for HPL with gimkl

5acae50

wpoely86 added 2 commits October 29, 2015 13:24

Added binutils for GCC 4.9.3

8b4ea7c

Added binutils to gimkl and gimpi

e841203

wpoely86 changed the title ~~{toolchain} [GNU/4.9.3-2.25] gimkl-1.6.0~~ {toolchain} [GCC/4.9.3] gimkl-1.6.0 Oct 29, 2015

wpoely86 changed the title ~~{toolchain} [GCC/4.9.3] gimkl-1.6.0~~ {toolchain} [GCC/4.9.3] gimkl-2.11.5 Oct 29, 2015

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2015

Merge pull request #2093 from wpoely86/gimkl

769bd2b

{toolchain} [GCC/4.9.3] gimkl-2.11.5

boegel merged commit 769bd2b into easybuilders:develop Oct 29, 2015

wpoely86 deleted the gimkl branch October 29, 2015 16:25

Conversation

wpoely86 commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel Oct 28, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 28, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants