List M4 as a dependency for GMP 6 by riccardomurri · Pull Request #2096 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

riccardomurri · 2015-10-29T01:03:14Z

See issue #2095 for details.

M4 is added as a dependency built with the "dummy" toolchain, as there is no need to optimize it.
(In principle, adding it as an OS/package dependency would work equally well.)

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-29T01:03:16Z

Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T08:05:21Z

ok to test

wpoely86 · 2015-10-29T08:05:49Z

@riccardomurri I prefer if you add the autotools bundle as a build dep. It includes the everything the build process might need.

boegel · 2015-10-29T08:08:39Z

+1 on Autotools

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-29T08:57:55Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4898/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

riccardomurri · 2015-10-29T14:02:30Z

I find the Autotools dependency overkill, but here you are :-)

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-29T14:17:08Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4914/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-29T14:49:58Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4915/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-10-29T16:16:03Z

use '' as version, otherwise the M4 dependency is not loaded

Done, for this and the other ones. Should I change the dummy toolchain version in the M4 build file as well?

What's the purpose of the "version" field in a dummy toolchain, anyway? and why does it matter?

…ld files.

hpcugentbot · 2015-10-29T17:07:20Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4919/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-10-29T21:10:41Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ad9df4adc61133f0d8f0 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-10-29T21:23:52Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 10 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/9b5f49a5547427ccfc44 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-10-29T21:36:50Z

@riccardomurri: failed test report due to fluke on my end, ignore

boegel · 2015-10-29T22:03:02Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 10 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/c6e703ea2ae9af1603db for a full test report.

nathanhaigh · 2016-01-12T01:05:44Z

Test report by @nathanhaigh
FAILED
Build succeeded for 13 out of 24 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux ubuntu 14.04, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz, Python 2.7.6
See https://gist.github.com/5aac44be2e00d3754c1c for a full test report.

nathanhaigh · 2016-01-12T01:41:33Z

GCC-4.7.2.eb

    /usr/bin/ld: cannot find crti.o: No such file or directory

GMP-6.0.0a-GCC-4.7.2.eb

    No module found for toolchain: GCC/4.7.2

Others

I think most of these failures are because of a lack of intel toolchains on my system

boegel · 2016-01-17T13:58:00Z

lgtm

boegel · 2016-01-17T14:21:59Z

Hmm, after extending this to also the GMP 6.1.0 easyconfigs we have now, I noticed that Autotools is being included explicitly as built with a dummy toolchain.

I'd like to avoid doing that, since when building stuff with the system compiler (as is implied by using dummy) you're at the mercy of what the OS provides, and we lose 'control'.

So, I would include Autotools as:

builddependencies = [
    ('Autotools', '20150215'),
]

to make Autotools be built with the 'parent' toolchain.

If sites want to make sure they only have one Autotools build for every version (which is a site-specific decision imho), the correct way would be to use the (currently still experimental) 'minimal toolchains' setting, cfr. http://easybuild.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Manipulating_dependencies.html#minimal-toolchains . Having resolving dependencies with minimal toolchains enabled by default may become the default setting in EasyBuild v3.0 (but I'm getting way ahead of myself now).

@riccardomurri: thoughts on this? I can build on top of your PR to make this happen, since a couple of extra Autotools easyconfigs will have to be added for now, let me know.

boegel · 2016-01-17T14:42:31Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/ec048cf4a52be0bf652c for a full test report.

riccardomurri · 2016-01-22T22:24:04Z

I agree with @boegel 's last comment: build with parent toolchain and let sites decide if they want to use the "minimal toolchain" option to only ever build Autotools etc. once

sync with develop

hpcugentbot · 2016-01-22T23:12:27Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5787/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

don't hardcode toolchain for Autotools build dep

hpcugentbot · 2016-01-22T23:32:13Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5788/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

add missing easyconfigs

hpcugentbot · 2016-01-23T00:21:11Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5789/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-01-23T01:40:36Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 40 out of 42 (42 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/c311e66348c1e968baca for a full test report.

fix version conflict on M4

hpcugentbot · 2016-01-23T14:28:35Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5796/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-01-23T15:47:17Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 42 out of 42 (42 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/552471a5f9f5a2038f57 for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-01-23T16:06:50Z

Going in, thanks @riccardomurri!

List M4 as a dependency for GMP 6

List M4 as a dependency for GMP 6

306eacb

riccardomurri mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2015

build of GMP 6.0.0a fails because of missing M4 dependency #2095

Closed

GMP: use Autotools dependency instead of M4

4783dcc

Add dummy-toolchain versions of Autoconf, Automake, libtool

71fe724

boegel added this to the v2.4.0 milestone Oct 29, 2015

boegel reviewed Oct 29, 2015
View reviewed changes

Use empty version with the "dummy" toolchain in Autotools-related bui…

a523524

…ld files.

boegel modified the milestones: v2.4.0, v2.5.0 Nov 9, 2015

boegel modified the milestones: v2.5.0, v2.6.0 Dec 14, 2015

boegel removed this from the v2.5.0 milestone Dec 14, 2015

Merge branch 'develop' into 2095_m4_dependency_for_gmp6

b4f5ee7

boegel mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2016

sync with develop riccardomurri/easybuild-easyconfigs#1

Merged

riccardomurri and others added 2 commits January 22, 2016 23:52

Merge pull request #1 from boegel/2095_m4_dependency_for_gmp6

eaba845

sync with develop

don't hardcode toolchain for Autotools build dep

667085e

boegel mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2016

don't hardcode toolchain for Autotools build dep riccardomurri/easybuild-easyconfigs#2

Merged

Merge pull request #2 from boegel/2095_m4_dependency_for_gmp6

3c4e433

don't hardcode toolchain for Autotools build dep

add missing easyconfigs

4ae7345

boegel mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2016

add missing easyconfigs riccardomurri/easybuild-easyconfigs#3

Merged

Merge pull request #3 from boegel/2095_m4_dependency_for_gmp6

62fe0e3

add missing easyconfigs

fix version conflict on M4

792c069

boegel mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2016

fix version conflict on M4 riccardomurri/easybuild-easyconfigs#4

Merged

Merge pull request #4 from boegel/2095_m4_dependency_for_gmp6

192563e

fix version conflict on M4

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2016

Merge pull request #2096 from riccardomurri/2095_m4_dependency_for_gmp6

fccbfeb

List M4 as a dependency for GMP 6

boegel merged commit fccbfeb into easybuilders:develop Jan 23, 2016

Conversation

riccardomurri commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

riccardomurri commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel Oct 29, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

riccardomurri Oct 29, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Oct 29, 2015

Uh oh!

nathanhaigh commented Jan 12, 2016

Uh oh!

nathanhaigh commented Jan 12, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 17, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 17, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 17, 2016

Uh oh!

riccardomurri commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jan 23, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 23, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jan 23, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 23, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 23, 2016

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants