{devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (REVIEW) by hajgato · Pull Request #2136 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

hajgato · 2015-11-12T15:37:00Z

Needs ~easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#740~~
(Sorry for this, it became a monster)

hpcugentbot · 2015-11-12T15:54:06Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4990/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-11-12T16:54:14Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4995/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-11-14T05:32:17Z

@wpoely86: please review? eb --review-pr is your friend here...

hajgato · 2015-11-16T15:24:14Z

@boegel @wpoely86
Qt 4 and Qt 5 should be able to be loaded at the same time.
OpenFOAM 3.0.0 uses CAGL 4.7 (needs Qt5) and ParaView 4.4.0 (needs Qt4)
The only possibility what I see to rename Qt 5.5.1 to Qt5 5.5.1
Any other idea or suggestions?

boegel · 2015-11-16T15:52:20Z

@hajgato: going with Qt5 is the only way to combine Qt 4.x and 5.x... Unless you create a Qt4 of the last Qt 4.x version, and use that to combine it with Qt 5.x. Then we'll only have a single Qt4 4.x easyconfig around, and we can stay away from fragmenting into Qt, Qt5, Qt6, etc.

wpoely86 · 2015-11-16T16:29:14Z

I would split it. New major version of Qt don't come that often and as they all can be loaded together, this is the proper way.

wpoely86 · 2015-11-16T16:30:11Z

@boegel how far do you want to take the versionsuffix spread?

I'm not sure. My gut feeling says it's ok here to not let it trickle up (since this is an uncommon dependency).

wpoely86 · 2015-11-16T18:09:31Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 29 out of 33 (15 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/c78c68a0df24e0d4abbc for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-11-16T19:22:08Z

@hajgato

./build-aux/ylwrap: line 176: yacc: command not found

missing dep for libxkbcommon-0.5.0-intel-2015b.eb ?

hajgato · 2015-11-16T19:55:27Z

@boegel @wpoely86 I am in favour to split to Qt5. Anyway, Qt 3 libs are libQt3*, Qt 4 libs are libQt[a-zA-Z]*, and Qt 5 libs are libQt5* (dont ask me why...

boegel · 2015-11-16T20:46:09Z

@hajgato: that's a good reason to go with Qt5 for Qt 5.x, and stick to Qt for Qt 4.x... Go for it.

hpcugentbot · 2015-11-17T09:04:23Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5039/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hajgato · 2015-11-17T10:10:58Z

@wpoely86 For me it worked.

wpoely86 · 2015-11-17T10:11:39Z

@hajgato well, if you have yacc installed on your system, it will work 😉

hajgato · 2015-11-17T10:13:06Z

@wpoely86 Well, that was also fixed. (this is what I referred in my previous comment)

wpoely86 · 2015-11-17T10:14:53Z

@hajgato okay, I will rerun the tests on my end.

hpcugentbot · 2015-11-17T11:07:21Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5042/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

wpoely86 · 2015-11-18T12:24:12Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 30 out of 33 (15 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/18be4e85ed798c282375 for a full test report.

hajgato · 2015-11-18T12:31:42Z

@wpoely86 Mesa FTP?

wpoely86 · 2015-11-18T12:33:48Z

@hajgato FTP is blocked here. I will download it manually.

wpoely86 · 2015-11-18T16:08:17Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 31 out of 33 (15 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/869994ff3b7875b482f9 for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-11-18T19:21:19Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 31 out of 33 (15 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/09725fbaa00ed05dd46b for a full test report.

hajgato · 2015-11-19T07:40:58Z

@wpoely86 FTP again

wpoely86 · 2015-11-19T12:24:44Z

Test report by @wpoely86
FAILED
Build succeeded for 32 out of 33 (15 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ab72d1a5da976682b0e8 for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-11-19T12:28:23Z

@hajgato can you increase the maxhits?

hajgato · 2015-11-19T18:23:25Z

@wpoely86 maxhits=120 added in the easyblock easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#740

wpoely86 · 2015-11-20T00:14:53Z

Test report by @wpoely86
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 33 out of 33 (15 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/d10482be0650084174c8 for a full test report.

wpoely86 · 2015-11-20T08:36:03Z

Hurray! Good to go!

boegel · 2015-11-26T20:59:06Z

shouldn't this be intltool?

@boegel: probably

@hajgato: ok, please change?

It would be nice to get this PR in, it's rather big, and we know what happens with big easyconfig PRs that stay around for too long...

@boegel Its fixed.

boegel · 2015-11-26T21:05:04Z

@hajgato: just a couple of tiny remarks, let's get this beast ready to merge!

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-09T09:41:47Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5177/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-09T14:00:14Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 21 out of 21 (21 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/9003791a2b11334c243d for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-12-09T14:16:33Z

Going in, thanks @hajgato!

{devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (REVIEW)

{devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (REVIEW)

1f55cbb

Mesa and libGLU added

fc3dac4

hajgato changed the title ~~{devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (REVIEW)~~ {devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (WIP) Nov 12, 2015

hajgato changed the title ~~{devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (WIP)~~ {devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (REVIEW) Nov 13, 2015

boegel added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Nov 14, 2015

hajgato mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2015

{numlib} [intel-2015b] CGAL 4.7 (REVIEW) #2139

Merged

hajgato changed the title ~~{devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (REVIEW)~~ {devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (WIP) Nov 16, 2015

wpoely86 reviewed Nov 16, 2015
View reviewed changes

hajgato mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2015

{cae} [intel-2015b] OpenFOAM 3.0.0. external dependencies (REVIEW) #2142

Merged

easyblock added

c733de9

easyblock fixed

7a56fe3

hajgato changed the title ~~{devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (WIP)~~ {devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (REVIEW) Nov 17, 2015

boegel reviewed Nov 26, 2015
View reviewed changes

boegel mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2015

Sanity check fitted for Qt 5 easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#740

Merged

Balazs Hajgato added 2 commits December 9, 2015 10:02

stytle corrected

c963feb

I->i

f81c668

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2015

Merge pull request #2136 from hajgato/Qt5

121f984

{devel} [intel-2015b] Qt 5.5.1 (REVIEW)

boegel merged commit 121f984 into easybuilders:develop Dec 9, 2015

hajgato deleted the Qt5 branch June 8, 2017 13:16

Conversation

hajgato commented Nov 12, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Nov 12, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Nov 12, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 14, 2015

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Nov 16, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 16, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 16, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 Nov 16, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Nov 16, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 16, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 16, 2015

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Nov 16, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 16, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Nov 17, 2015

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Nov 17, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 17, 2015

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Nov 17, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 17, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Nov 17, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 18, 2015

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Nov 18, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 18, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 18, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 18, 2015

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Nov 19, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 19, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 19, 2015

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Nov 19, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 20, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 commented Nov 20, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel Nov 26, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hajgato Dec 9, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Dec 9, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hajgato Dec 9, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel commented Nov 26, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 9, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 9, 2015