Skip to content

{lib}[intel/2015b] GeoIP 1.3.2 w/ Python 2.7.10 (REVIEW)#2172

Merged
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:GeoIP_intel2015b_py2710
Dec 1, 2015
Merged

{lib}[intel/2015b] GeoIP 1.3.2 w/ Python 2.7.10 (REVIEW)#2172
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:GeoIP_intel2015b_py2710

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented Dec 1, 2015

No description provided.

@boegel boegel added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Dec 1, 2015
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 1, 2015

@ehiggs: please review

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 1, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/0a3c979e31ebac0a11a9 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 1, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/b162a6d67c296d6a8224 for a full test report.

@ehiggs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ehiggs commented Dec 1, 2015

👍

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5102/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 1, 2015

Thanks for the review @ehiggs!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2015
{lib}[intel/2015b] GeoIP 1.3.2 w/ Python 2.7.10 (REVIEW)
@boegel boegel merged commit 7fada7f into easybuilders:develop Dec 1, 2015
@boegel boegel deleted the GeoIP_intel2015b_py2710 branch December 1, 2015 13:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants