{*}[intel/2015.08] HPL 2.1 (REVIEW) by boegel · Pull Request #2194 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

boegel · 2015-12-08T08:20:39Z

latest version of the 2015 Intel compilers + latest Intel MPI and MKL

requires ~~#2108~~ #2214

boegel · 2015-12-08T08:21:00Z

@wpoely86: please review?

this is a good candidate for intel/2016a imho

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-08T08:44:20Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5161/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

wpoely86 · 2015-12-08T09:28:10Z

Isn't it clear to also add GCC/GCC-Core here?

good suggestion, it'll make the dependency more explicit; same for binutils?

…9.3-2.25

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-13T17:52:34Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5268/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-13T17:54:53Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5269/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-13T18:39:11Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5271/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-13T18:41:06Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5272/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-13T19:20:45Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/9073a794441b35bd3642 for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-12-13T19:55:22Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/937c212884e9211b99b7 for a full test report.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-13T20:50:20Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5275/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-14T10:32:22Z

as pointed out by @ocaisa in #2214, this should be GCCcore, and binutils should be included as well as a dep

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-14T16:18:55Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5296/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-14T16:57:26Z

Jenkins: test this please

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-14T17:15:54Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5302/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2015-12-14T18:07:00Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/e8adadd529b5ffcdc9ad for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-12-14T18:36:26Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 8 out of 8 (8 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.1.1503, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/09ecd995606cfd76a58c for a full test report.

boegel · 2015-12-14T22:14:22Z

Good to go, thanks for the review @wpoely86!

{*}[intel/2015.08] HPL 2.1 (REVIEW)

add easyconfigs for intel/2015.08 toolchain + HPL as test case

0675fbd

boegel added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Dec 8, 2015

wpoely86 reviewed Dec 8, 2015
View reviewed changes

This was referenced Dec 12, 2015

GCCcore #2108

Closed

{bundle}[dummy] GCC-4.9.3-2.25: bundle of GCCcore 4.9.3 and binutils 2.25 #2214

Merged

boegel added 2 commits December 13, 2015 18:10

avoid 'gnu' as variable name in icc/ifort easyconfigs based on GCC/4.…

6b07c6e

…9.3-2.25

include GCCcore and binutils as explicit deps in intel/2015.08

6e93db6

boegel force-pushed the intel201508 branch from bea9ee6 to 6e93db6 Compare December 13, 2015 17:15

boegel added 2 commits December 13, 2015 18:50

fix versionsuffix for binutils in intel/2015.08

217e8dd

fix typo

9c5b89b

boegel changed the title ~~add easyconfigs for intel/2015.08 toolchain + HPL as test case~~ {*}[intel/2015.08] HPL 2.1 (REVIEW) Dec 13, 2015

boegel mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2015

EasyBuild 2.5.0 (roadmap) easybuilders/easybuild#170

Closed

16 tasks

boegel reviewed Dec 14, 2015
View reviewed changes

use GCCcore+binutils as base for icc/ifort in intel/2015.08

7908afb

boegel mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2015

update easyblocks for Intel tools to support 2016 versions easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#756

Merged

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2015

Merge pull request #2194 from boegel/intel201508

df4ba38

{*}[intel/2015.08] HPL 2.1 (REVIEW)

boegel merged commit df4ba38 into easybuilders:develop Dec 14, 2015

boegel deleted the intel201508 branch December 14, 2015 22:14

Conversation

boegel commented Dec 8, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 8, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 8, 2015

Uh oh!

wpoely86 Dec 8, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Dec 12, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

wpoely86 Dec 12, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 13, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel Dec 14, 2015

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants