added new Cray* toolchain versions with dependency pinning by gppezzi · Pull Request #2222 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

gppezzi · 2015-12-14T12:40:15Z

This PR adds eb files for the new CrayGNU, CrayIntel and CrayCCE toolchains (with dep. pinning). For validation, it adds also easyconfig files for HPL.

Requires: EB 2.5.0 and hpcugent/easybuild-easyblocks/pull/766

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-14T12:41:23Z

Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

boegel · 2015-12-14T12:46:55Z

Jenkins: ok to test

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-14T13:08:12Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5285/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-14T13:18:10Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5287/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2015-12-18T10:53:13Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5393/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

gppezzi · 2015-12-18T14:43:30Z

Test report by @gppezzi
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SLES 11_SP3, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v3 @ 2.30GHz, Python 2.7.7
See https://gist.github.com/7fb936ce407b0d1bd61b for a full test report.

gppezzi · 2015-12-18T14:48:57Z

Test report by @gppezzi
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SLES 11_SP3, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.6
See https://gist.github.com/0a3ee80209310ac02651 for a full test report.

gppezzi · 2016-01-18T16:30:09Z

@boegel please let me know how to proceed, if you prefer that I make separate PRs for each toolchain or not (the .eb are very similar, there are only a few differences on the dependencies)

pforai · 2016-01-18T19:19:00Z

@gppezzi Individual TC PRs is fine, each with a matching HPL config that builds with that would be ideal.

boegel · 2016-01-18T20:05:06Z

@gppezzi: I wouldn't bother splitting this up, it's not really going to help much (if anything, it'll add more overhead, for the both of us)

The general rule-of-thumb is to keep easyconfig PRs below 10 new easyconfigs.

This is kind of an exception, since the easyconfigs are so similar to each other (in two groups).
The HPL easyconfigs are pretty much a no-brainer since they're (near) identical to each other but also to existing HPL easyconfigs (only exception is the extra patch in the CCE ones).

The others are simple enough to review in a single PR, since it's basically just a matter of the toolchain definition.

gppezzi · 2016-01-21T18:14:22Z

Test report by @gppezzi
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SLES 11_SP3, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.6
See https://gist.github.com/27a760d46e7dfb24ed23 for a full test report.

gppezzi · 2016-01-21T18:15:17Z

Test report by @gppezzi
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SLES 11_SP3, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v3 @ 2.30GHz, Python 2.7.7
See https://gist.github.com/0beca8c3b1462ee1645f for a full test report.

gppezzi · 2016-01-21T18:46:03Z

@pforai It would be great if you could test these easyconfigs (using easyblock from #766) on any other Cray site...

Of course it is only expected to work out of the box if they have the PEs from 2015.06 and 2015.11 installed.

boegel · 2016-01-21T18:55:56Z

you're missing a version-fixed intel here

hpcugentbot · 2016-01-22T10:47:50Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5773/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-01-22T18:24:16Z

@gppezzi: does it makes sense to use the same intel version in both 2015.06 and 2015.11?

Also, can you submit a new test report? Just for CrayIntel is fine, but I guess a full one is easier. ;)

boegel · 2016-01-22T18:24:44Z

@pforai: ping on a test report for this on non-CSCS Cray systems?

gppezzi · 2016-01-22T19:55:56Z

@boegel the intel version didn't seem to change from June to November. the release notes don't mention the minor version they provide and this is the only one from the 15 series we have. (Release notes from may still suggested to use 14.x but not in June)

Test report is on the way

gppezzi · 2016-01-22T20:02:50Z

Test report by @gppezzi
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SLES 11_SP3, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v3 @ 2.30GHz, Python 2.7.7
See https://gist.github.com/ee653dbbe01c9dd85df7 for a full test report.

gppezzi · 2016-01-22T20:05:36Z

Test report by @gppezzi
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SLES 11_SP3, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.6
See https://gist.github.com/4737cfb98962bba09408 for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-01-22T21:58:34Z

Despite some concerns w.r.t. the intel version used in the CrayIntel toolchain, this is good to go.

Thanks a lot for working on this @gppezzi, this is a huge step towards stable Cray support (cfr. easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1390)!

added new Cray* toolchain versions with dependency pinning

pforai · 2016-01-27T09:47:41Z

Test report by @pforai
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SLES 11_SP3, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.9
See https://gist.github.com/bdce401c48fa3d4ee2d6 for a full test report.

pforai · 2016-01-27T09:55:12Z

Test report by @pforai
FAILED
Build succeeded for 9 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SLES 11_SP3, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.9
See https://gist.github.com/650e5060c847e6e50142 for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-01-27T19:39:04Z

@pforai: what's going on with the failed reports? Is that the swap issue for all toolchain deps?

added new toolchain version with dependency pinning

88057a2

boegel added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Dec 14, 2015

added sample easyconfig files for new CrayGNU XC toolchain

7ec4aad

boegel modified the milestones: v2.6.0, v2.5.0 Dec 15, 2015

boegel mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2015

Added sample HPL easyconfig files for new CrayGNU-2015 TC #2239

Closed

gppezzi changed the title ~~added new CrayGNU toolchain version with dependency pinning~~ added new Cray* toolchain versions with dependency pinning Dec 18, 2015

added new ebs for CrayCCE, CrayIntel TCs and HPL

f2af2a8

gppezzi mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2016

trying to fix 1342_pgisupport easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1537

Closed

gppezzi mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2016

generic easyblock for Cray toolchains easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#766

Merged

boegel reviewed Jan 21, 2016
View reviewed changes

boegel mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2016

EasyBuild 2.6.0 (roadmap) easybuilders/easybuild#176

Closed

19 tasks

pinned version for intel

a808ad8

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2016

Merge pull request #2222 from gppezzi/craygnu_xc

f504448

added new Cray* toolchain versions with dependency pinning

boegel merged commit f504448 into easybuilders:develop Jan 22, 2016

boegel mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2016

stabilize Cray support easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1390

Closed

17 tasks

Conversation

gppezzi commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 14, 2015

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Dec 18, 2015

Uh oh!

gppezzi commented Dec 18, 2015

Uh oh!

gppezzi commented Dec 18, 2015

Uh oh!

gppezzi commented Jan 18, 2016

Uh oh!

pforai commented Jan 18, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 18, 2016

Uh oh!

gppezzi commented Jan 21, 2016

Uh oh!

gppezzi commented Jan 21, 2016

Uh oh!

gppezzi commented Jan 21, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel Jan 21, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

gppezzi commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

gppezzi commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

gppezzi commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 22, 2016

Uh oh!

pforai commented Jan 27, 2016

Uh oh!

pforai commented Jan 27, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 27, 2016

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants