Skip to content

{base}[foss/2024a] REViewer v0.2.7#22518

Merged
ocaisa merged 11 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
asp8200:20250311150943_new_pr_REViewer027
Mar 12, 2025
Merged

{base}[foss/2024a] REViewer v0.2.7#22518
ocaisa merged 11 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
asp8200:20250311150943_new_pr_REViewer027

Conversation

@asp8200
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@asp8200 asp8200 commented Mar 11, 2025

(created using eb --new-pr)

…ordinates.cpp.patch, graph-tools.CMakeLists.txt.patch, reviewer.CMakeLists.txt.patch
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the new label Mar 11, 2025
@asp8200
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

asp8200 commented Mar 11, 2025

I guess this PR needs to be merged first.

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/r/REViewer/REViewer-0.2.7-foss-2024a.eb Outdated
Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/r/REViewer/graph-tools.CMakeLists.txt.patch
Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/r/REViewer/reviewer.CMakeLists.txt.patch
@ocaisa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ocaisa commented Mar 12, 2025

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ocaisa: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=22518 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_22518 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 5917

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2717006333 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/d18acabb3b974c9c37353c6f9d2582d1 for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ocaisa ocaisa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I reshuffled the easyconfig parameters to be in line with the typical (though not enforced) ordering.

@ocaisa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ocaisa commented Mar 12, 2025

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ocaisa: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=22518 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_22518 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 5918

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2717032810 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/4c2183514a234a35dd537a3db1f74f21 for a full test report.

@ocaisa ocaisa enabled auto-merge March 12, 2025 08:32
@ocaisa ocaisa merged commit e69e4d5 into easybuilders:develop Mar 12, 2025
10 checks passed
@boegel boegel added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Mar 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants