Skip to content

{bio}[intel/2016a] EggLib v2.1.10 (REVIEW)#2335

Merged
boegel merged 3 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20160118222956_new_pr_EggLib2110
Jan 21, 2016
Merged

{bio}[intel/2016a] EggLib v2.1.10 (REVIEW)#2335
boegel merged 3 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20160118222956_new_pr_EggLib2110

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented Jan 18, 2016

(created using eb --new-pr)

requires easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#811

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 18, 2016

This works, but maybe there's too much trickery going on in here, which should be handled via an easyblock instead...

@wpoely86: please review?

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5697/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 18, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/5db9d2c723a1fade364d for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added this to the v2.6.0 milestone Jan 19, 2016
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't we stick to .10 to avoid dep hell?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We'll have to move to .11 sooner or later. I already did for DOLFIN, for example.

And we're really close to moving on to intel/2016a now, so jumping to Python 2.7.11 is going to happen anyway.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for 2016a sure, but I would stick to .10 for intel2015b

@wpoely86
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This one feels dirty.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 19, 2016

@wpoely86: it does, it needs an easyblock for sure

@boegel boegel changed the title {bio}[intel/2015b] EggLib v2.1.10 {bio}[intel/2015b] EggLib v2.1.10 (WIP) Jan 19, 2016
@boegel boegel changed the title {bio}[intel/2015b] EggLib v2.1.10 (WIP) {bio}[intel/2015b] EggLib v2.1.10 (REVIEW) Jan 21, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 21, 2016

@wpoely86: updated, now requires easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#811

@boegel boegel force-pushed the 20160118222956_new_pr_EggLib2110 branch from 6109405 to 46d5f0a Compare January 21, 2016 12:34
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 21, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/c934b4c0c6a8d0c90b8c for a full test report.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5733/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5734/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel boegel changed the title {bio}[intel/2015b] EggLib v2.1.10 (REVIEW) {bio}[intel/2016a] EggLib v2.1.10 (REVIEW) Jan 21, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 21, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/d31c908948c0441c3275 for a full test report.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5745/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 21, 2016

Jenkins: test this please

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5761/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Jan 21, 2016

All cleaned up, good to go, thanks for the review @wpoely86!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2016
{bio}[intel/2016a] EggLib v2.1.10 (REVIEW)
@boegel boegel merged commit 4986b1a into easybuilders:develop Jan 21, 2016
@boegel boegel deleted the 20160118222956_new_pr_EggLib2110 branch January 21, 2016 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants