Skip to content

{tools}[GCCcore/13.3.0] antiword v0.37#23924

Merged
boegel merged 10 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
stevenvdb:20250919132837_new_pr_antiword037
Oct 15, 2025
Merged

{tools}[GCCcore/13.3.0] antiword v0.37#23924
boegel merged 10 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
stevenvdb:20250919132837_new_pr_antiword037

Conversation

@stevenvdb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

…word-0.37_allow-custom-antiworddir.patch, antiword-0.37_fix-installdir.patch
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the new label Sep 19, 2025
@Thyre Thyre added the 2024a issues & PRs related to 2024a common toolchains label Sep 19, 2025
Comment on lines +12 to +13
source_urls = ['https://fossies.org/linux/misc/old/']
sources = [SOURCE_TAR_GZ]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, the website seems to be dead ( at least for me ).
Is there another source url we can use?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@stevenvdb stevenvdb Oct 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is weird, for me the direct link https://fossies.org/linux/misc/old/antiword-0.37.tar.gz is still working. I found two GitHub repositories with some version of the code (https://github.com/rsdoiel/antiword and https://github.com/grobian/antiword). I am not sure how stable those are and there are some differences in the code with the tar file from fossies.org. If the current source url keeps refusing to work for you, I will have a look at the GitHub repositories that contain the code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe this is also just my connection. We can check if jsc-zen3 cooperates once the CI passes 😄

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The download also failed on jsc-zen3. I now changed the source location to a github repository, could you try the CI build again?

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/a/antiword/antiword-0.37-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb Outdated
@stevenvdb stevenvdb requested a review from Thyre October 13, 2025 14:45
Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/a/antiword/antiword-0.37-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb Outdated
@Thyre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thyre commented Oct 13, 2025

We forgot a whitespace 😕

 ./easybuild/easyconfigs/a/antiword/antiword-0.37-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb:8:76: W291 trailing whitespace

@Thyre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thyre commented Oct 13, 2025

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Thyre: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=23924 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_23924 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8336

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 3397898884 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/345b0057fe53fb9b9d02c0bed669813a for a full test report.

@stevenvdb stevenvdb changed the title {tools}[GCCcore/13.3.0] antiword v0.37 WIP: {tools}[GCCcore/13.3.0] antiword v0.37 Oct 13, 2025
@Thyre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thyre commented Oct 13, 2025

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Thyre: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=23924 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_23924 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8342

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 3398121180 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/3a271a7e8ac6e55d905f79260a63cd2f for a full test report.

@Thyre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thyre commented Oct 13, 2025

Test report by @Thyre
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
ZAM054 - Linux Zorin OS 17, x86_64, 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1260P, 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce MX550, 580.65.06, Python 3.10.12
See https://gist.github.com/Thyre/349914a0ea6da0107d50103f35cf5360 for a full test report.

@stevenvdb stevenvdb changed the title WIP: {tools}[GCCcore/13.3.0] antiword v0.37 {tools}[GCCcore/13.3.0] antiword v0.37 Oct 14, 2025
Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/a/antiword/antiword-0.37-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb Outdated
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Oct 15, 2025

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Oct 15, 2025

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3512.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/f87a6be239e25f93382bce85077b3db2 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=23924 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_23924 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8383

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 3404783082 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c2.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/2b0d7c0eb81f987c42795892e57e2928 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added this to the next release (5.2.0?) milestone Oct 15, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Oct 15, 2025

Going in, thanks @stevenvdb!

@boegel boegel merged commit cf0ae06 into easybuilders:develop Oct 15, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2024a issues & PRs related to 2024a common toolchains new ready-to-review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants