{lib}[foss/2025a] neko v0.9.1 by tuananhdao · Pull Request #24438 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

tuananhdao · 2025-11-02T23:04:25Z

(created using eb --new-pr)

Requires

{lib}[foss/2025a] json-fortran v8.3.0 #24437

Thyre

Thanks for your PR 😄
I've added a few comments on how the PR could be improved. I'm not familiar with neko, but maybe they help a bit regardless.

Micket

all the stuff Thyre said

Micket · 2025-11-04T22:13:48Z

+sources = ['v%(version)s.tar.gz']
+
+dependencies = [
+    ('json-fortran', '8.3.0'),


I'd first try it with json-fortran-9.0.5-GCC-14.2.0.eb to see if that will work here; otherwise it's introducing a fork where we end up with incompatible modules inside the toolchain which is always a pain in the butt.

I am unsure if I should have ('json-fortran', '9.0.5-GCC-14.2.0', '', True) or just ('json-fortran', '9.0.5')

tuananhdao · 2025-11-05T20:22:32Z

Hi @Micket and @Thyre,

Thank you for the very helpful comments. I have tried to address them.
I am from the neko dev team trying to get neko into EESSI.
I wanted to try only the bare minimum version of neko in first since EESSI 2025a doesn't have parmetis, json-fortran yet. The 2023b has them but I think going for 2025a is better. I will submit the missing packages to their repo as well.

With that said, I totally get your points but I haven't been able to test this updated version of the eb file yet.

ocaisa · 2025-11-06T08:49:31Z

@tuananhdao Just to mention, there is a licencing problem with ParMetis (it does not have an open source licence that allows us to redistribute) and we cannot include that in EESSI. That doesn't mean you can't include it in your final recipe here, but be aware that we will have to filter it out on the EESSI side.

ocaisa · 2025-11-06T09:01:46Z

Also FYI, I noticed Neko has support for ADIOS2, there is ongoing work to include that in EB (see #23215 and other related PRs)

Micket

lgtm

We could hold of for ADIOS2 is we get those tests passing there, if ADIOS2 is an important dependency for neko (I have no idea)

tuananhdao · 2025-11-07T11:23:05Z

lgtm

We could hold of for ADIOS2 is we get those tests passing there, if ADIOS2 is an important dependency for neko (I have no idea)

ADIOS2 is optional. But I agree we should include that when ADIOS2 is included in eb.

The only required dependency is json-fortran.

Thyre · 2025-11-09T09:43:32Z

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

boegelbot · 2025-11-09T09:50:10Z

@Thyre: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=24438 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_24438 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 8703

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 3507844461 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2025-11-09T09:51:00Z

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (total: 31 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/28192cb7260a896caf591439d5a31a84 for a full test report.

boegel · 2025-12-13T16:33:36Z

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

boegelbot · 2025-12-13T16:40:09Z

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=24438 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_24438 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 9118

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 3649596457 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2025-12-13T16:43:43Z

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 3 mins 18 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c2.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/cdd610e370cdcb0f57464ff71d1c5e47 for a full test report.

boegel · 2025-12-13T16:46:57Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 3 mins 36 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
node4245.shinx.os - Linux RHEL 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core Processor (zen4), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/09d8aeb97f3e0da24a892f49e2ac3df2 for a full test report.

boegel

lgtm

boegel · 2025-12-13T17:06:30Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 3 mins 20 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3535.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/e8aac9f61dbbf90fa9f9411857019a62 for a full test report.

boegel · 2025-12-13T17:10:30Z

Going in, thanks @tuananhdao!

boegel · 2025-12-13T17:48:47Z

I'm also looking into adding this to EESSI:

{2025.06}[2025a] neko 0.9.1 EESSI/software-layer#1339

Neko 1.0.0 has been released recently, we should probably also look into that...

adding easyconfigs: neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a-cpu.eb

b728399

github-actions Bot added the new label Nov 2, 2025

Thyre added the 2025a issues & PRs related to 2025a common toolchains label Nov 3, 2025

Thyre reviewed Nov 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

Micket requested changes Nov 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

tuananhdao added 4 commits November 5, 2025 21:00

apply changes from comments

0128627

fix accidental changes

0352f4e

fix linter, try removing the sed command

99aa8a5

add checksums

66047f6

tuananhdao added 2 commits November 5, 2025 21:27

add sanity check commands

dde5d0b

insert easybuild flags

6bcfca5

tuananhdao requested review from Micket and Thyre November 5, 2025 20:32

Update neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a-cpu.eb

560f056

ocaisa and others added 2 commits November 6, 2025 10:05

Rename neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a-cpu.eb to neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a.eb

08d1551

fix indentation

8843a8a

Micket changed the title ~~{lib}[foss/2025a] neko v0.9.1 w/ cpu~~ {lib}[foss/2025a] neko v0.9.1 Nov 7, 2025

Micket reviewed Nov 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/n/neko/neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a.eb Outdated

Update easybuild/easyconfigs/n/neko/neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a.eb

7976292

Micket previously approved these changes Nov 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

Micket reviewed Nov 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/n/neko/neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a.eb

Update easybuild/easyconfigs/n/neko/neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a.eb

d84993b

Micket dismissed their stale review via d84993b November 7, 2025 09:21

boegel requested changes Dec 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/n/neko/neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a.eb Outdated

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/n/neko/neko-0.9.1-foss-2025a.eb Outdated

boegel added 2 commits December 13, 2025 17:33

fix preconfigopts for neko 0.9.1

ea6c1fd

use cae as moduleclass for neko

5204dc9

boegel added the EuroHPC label Dec 13, 2025

boegel added this to the next release (5.2.0?) milestone Dec 13, 2025

boegel approved these changes Dec 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

boegel merged commit 32d6d1b into easybuilders:develop Dec 13, 2025
8 checks passed

Conversation

tuananhdao commented Nov 2, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Thyre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Micket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Micket Nov 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

tuananhdao Nov 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

tuananhdao commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

ocaisa commented Nov 6, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ocaisa commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Micket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

tuananhdao commented Nov 7, 2025

Uh oh!

Thyre commented Nov 9, 2025

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Nov 9, 2025

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Nov 9, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 13, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

tuananhdao commented Nov 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

ocaisa commented Nov 6, 2025 •

edited

Loading