{numlib}[GCC/14.3.0] AOCL-LAPACK v5.1 by bartoldeman · Pull Request #25048 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

bartoldeman · 2026-01-13T19:14:39Z

(created using eb --new-pr)

bartoldeman · 2026-01-13T19:16:15Z

This should probably use a custom easyblock, especially with the test cases.
Just trying to see if it works on jsc as well

bartoldeman · 2026-01-13T19:18:14Z

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

boegelbot · 2026-01-13T19:20:08Z

@bartoldeman: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=25048 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_25048 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 9387

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 3746021714 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2026-01-13T19:35:44Z

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (total: 15 mins 18 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.7, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.23
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/854389bdc3d52a01c9508120d908eb7f for a full test report.

bartoldeman · 2026-01-13T19:41:30Z

Test report by @bartoldeman
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 15 mins 59 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
login1.int.archimedes.c3.ca - Linux AlmaLinux 9.7 (Moss Jungle Cat), x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (SapphireRapids) (icelake), Python 3.11.4
See https://gist.github.com/bartoldeman/d942d4524f1c6437f2f830a040fa390a for a full test report.

Thyre · 2026-01-14T07:32:34Z

Test report by @Thyre
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 7 mins 20 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
Linux - Linux Arch Linux UNKNOWN, x86_64, AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor, 1 x AMD Navi 48 [Radeon RX 9070/9070 XT/9070 GRE] (device id: 0x7550, gfx: gfx1201, driver: Linuxversion6.18.4-arch1-1(linux@archlinux)(gcc(GCC)15.2.120260103,GNUld(GNUBinutils)2.45.1)#1SMPPREEMPT_DYNAMICFri,09Jan202619:43:48+0000), 1 x AMD Raphael (device id: 0x164e, gfx: gfx1036, driver: Linuxversion6.18.4-arch1-1(linux@archlinux)(gcc(GCC)15.2.120260103,GNUld(GNUBinutils)2.45.1)#1SMPPREEMPT_DYNAMICFri,09Jan202619:43:48+0000), Python 3.14.2
See https://gist.github.com/Thyre/e122948e09dd4a502bb5eed874f5caa5 for a full test report.

Thyre · 2026-01-14T07:39:50Z

Test report by @Thyre
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 13 mins 28 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
Framework - Linux Fedora Linux 43, x86_64, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 w/ Radeon 860M (zen5), 1 x AMD Krackan [Radeon 840M / 860M Graphics] (device id: 0x1114, gfx: gfx1152, driver: Linuxversion6.18.4-200.fc43.x86_64(mockbuild@bc1e0bf216f84bd4841c551523010be9)(gcc(GCC)15.2.120251211(RedHat15.2.1-5),GNUldversion2.45.1-1.fc43)#1SMPPREEMPT_DYNAMICThuJan817:35:49UTC2026), Python 3.14.2
See https://gist.github.com/Thyre/11bc7180be0359b0857c42e3d6c14e58 for a full test report.

jfgrimm · 2026-01-14T11:20:31Z

Test report by @jfgrimm
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (total: 26 mins 34 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
himem02.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.10, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/f4e68157839b15c66b1fd011c79f4ab2 for a full test report.

                        -->   LAPACK TESTING SUMMARY  <--  
                Processing LAPACK Testing output found in the TESTING directory
SUMMARY                 nb test run     numerical error         other error  
================        ===========     =================       ================  
REAL                    1555590         13      (0.001%)        0       (0.000%)     
DOUBLE PRECISION        1563096         70      (0.004%)        0       (0.000%)     
COMPLEX                 1019266         118     (0.012%)        0       (0.000%)     
COMPLEX16               1027689         5       (0.000%)        0       (0.000%)     

--> ALL PRECISIONS      5165641         206     (0.004%)        0       (0.000%)     


AOCL-LAPACK failed routines summary:

SVX: 12 out of 6294 tests failed to pass the threshold
*** Error(s) or Failure(s) while testing STFSM ***
DEV: 10 out of 1102 tests failed to pass the threshold
DVX: 60 out of 6342 tests failed to pass the threshold
CHS: 1 out of 2016 tests failed to pass the threshold
CEV: 14 out of 1106 tests failed to pass the threshold
CVX: 18 out of 5190 tests failed to pass the threshold
CGV drivers: 40 out of 1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
CGV drivers: 45 out of 1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
ZHS: 1 out of 2016 tests failed to pass the threshold
ZEV: 4 out of 1096 tests failed to pass the threshold
********************************************************************************
Failed routines:
SVX STFSM DEV DVX CHS CEV CVX CGV ZHS ZEV  
********************************************************************************
Total illegal value errors: {0} 0
Total exit tests failing: {0} 0
********************************************************************************
Total failed tests:  206

bartoldeman · 2026-01-14T12:05:17Z

Thanks for the testing. So jsc-zen3 had 233 failures and @jfgrimm 206. I can probably set the threshold at 250.

branfosj · 2026-01-14T13:19:28Z

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 50 mins 7 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0208u17a - Linux RHEL 8.10, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor (zen4), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/2ffb31c70a37391d6531b71e11f7446c for a full test report.

            -->   LAPACK TESTING SUMMARY  <--
        Processing LAPACK Testing output found in the TESTING directory
SUMMARY                 nb test run     numerical error     other error
================    =========== =================   ================
REAL                1555590     19  (0.001%)    0   (0.000%)
DOUBLE PRECISION    1563096     20  (0.001%)    0   (0.000%)
COMPLEX             1022590     15  (0.001%)    0   (0.000%)
COMPLEX16           980430      10  (0.001%)    0   (0.000%)

--> ALL PRECISIONS  5121706     64  (0.001%)    0   (0.000%)


AOCL-LAPACK failed routines summary:

SVX: 18 out of 6300 tests failed to pass the threshold
*** Error(s) or Failure(s) while testing STFSM ***
DEV: 2 out of 1094 tests failed to pass the threshold
DVX: 18 out of 6300 tests failed to pass the threshold
CHS: 1 out of 2016 tests failed to pass the threshold
CHS: 2 out of 2016 tests failed to pass the threshold
CHS: 2 out of 2016 tests failed to pass the threshold
CEV: 10 out of 1102 tests failed to pass the threshold
ZEV: 10 out of 1102 tests failed to pass the threshold
********************************************************************************
Failed routines:
SVX STFSM DEV DVX CHS CEV ZEV
********************************************************************************
Total illegal value errors: {0} 0
Total exit tests failing: {0} 0
********************************************************************************
Total failed tests:  64

branfosj · 2026-01-14T13:23:07Z

I see the same failure summary for Intel Sapphire Rapids and IceLake CPUs.

bartoldeman · 2026-01-14T19:20:48Z

This now needs easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#4042

bartoldeman · 2026-01-14T19:34:07Z

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=4042"

boegelbot · 2026-01-14T19:40:09Z

@bartoldeman: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=25048 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=4042" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_25048 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 9399

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 3751262565 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2026-01-14T19:52:53Z

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#4042
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (total: 12 mins 25 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.7, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.23
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/2eb925b8a1c152fdc83fb9926c0926a3 for a full test report.

bartoldeman · 2026-01-15T14:41:11Z

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=4042"

@jfgrimm

Suggestions from @jfgrimm Co-authored-by: Jasper Grimm <[email protected]>

boegelbot · 2026-01-15T14:50:10Z

@bartoldeman: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=25048 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=4042" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_25048 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

exit code: 0
output:

Submitted batch job 9405

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 3755206212 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

boegelbot · 2026-01-15T15:03:26Z

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#4042
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 12 mins 58 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.7, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.23
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/45cc672a31d25a4c26b6df180057bbac for a full test report.

jfgrimm · 2026-02-02T12:41:55Z

Test report by @jfgrimm
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#4042
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 42 mins 9 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
himem02.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.10, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/498e62fa6c4599c2134737966f4c809d for a full test report.

…asyconfigs into 20260113191436_new_pr_AOCL-LAPACK51

jfgrimm · 2026-02-04T11:43:17Z

Going in, thanks @bartoldeman!

adding easyconfigs: AOCL-LAPACK-5.1-GCC-14.3.0.eb

52e2225

bartoldeman added the new label Jan 13, 2026

github-actions Bot added the 2025b issues & PRs related to 2025b common toolchains label Jan 13, 2026

bartoldeman marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2026 19:15

Python should be 3.13.5

74e9b58

Convert AOCL-LAPACK to use its own easyblock

0a90a9d

Remove trailing whitespace

4bb5eff

bartoldeman marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2026 19:34

jfgrimm reviewed Jan 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread easybuild/easyconfigs/a/AOCL-LAPACK/AOCL-LAPACK-5.1-GCC-14.3.0.eb

bartoldeman and others added 2 commits January 15, 2026 09:43

TABs -> spaces

00af657

Suggestions from @jfgrimm Co-authored-by: Jasper Grimm <[email protected]>

Properly use whitespace

194d49b

Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-e…

8fde3ec

…asyconfigs into 20260113191436_new_pr_AOCL-LAPACK51

jfgrimm added this to the next release (5.2.1?) milestone Feb 2, 2026

jfgrimm approved these changes Feb 4, 2026

View reviewed changes

jfgrimm merged commit 87fd6e0 into easybuilders:develop Feb 4, 2026
8 checks passed

Conversation

bartoldeman commented Jan 13, 2026

Uh oh!

bartoldeman commented Jan 13, 2026

Uh oh!

bartoldeman commented Jan 13, 2026

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Jan 13, 2026

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Jan 13, 2026

Uh oh!

bartoldeman commented Jan 13, 2026

Uh oh!

Thyre commented Jan 14, 2026

Uh oh!

Thyre commented Jan 14, 2026

Uh oh!

jfgrimm commented Jan 14, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bartoldeman commented Jan 14, 2026

Uh oh!

branfosj commented Jan 14, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

branfosj commented Jan 14, 2026

Uh oh!

bartoldeman commented Jan 14, 2026

Uh oh!

bartoldeman commented Jan 14, 2026

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Jan 14, 2026

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Jan 14, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bartoldeman commented Jan 15, 2026

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Jan 15, 2026

Uh oh!

boegelbot commented Jan 15, 2026

Uh oh!

jfgrimm commented Feb 2, 2026

Uh oh!

jfgrimm commented Feb 4, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

jfgrimm commented Jan 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading

branfosj commented Jan 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading