{vis}[intel-2016a] libX11 1.6.3 (REVIEW) by hajgato · Pull Request #2549 · easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs

hajgato · 2016-02-23T13:38:09Z

The following packages were moved to builddeps:
xcb-proto, xextproto, inputproto, kbproto, and ibpthread-stubs

xcb-proto is one pkconfig file, a bunch of Python files and a couple of xml files.
xextproto is one pkconfig file, a bunch of header files, and a couple of xml files.
inputproto is one pkconfig file, and a couple of header files.
kbproto is one pkconfig file, a couple of header files, and a bunch of xml and svg files.
libpthread-stubs is one pkconfig file.

We have to check this new configuration on a completely X-less machine, and we have to check softwares depend on libX11, they might need (some of) the above modules as builddependencies.

Only xcp-proto depends on Python, and as it is now only a builddependency, libX11 is finally Python free!

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-23T13:53:48Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6515/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-02-24T14:58:56Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/3b5492eefafccf2bacab for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-24T15:29:38Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/b39b4f05c21bc576209c for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-24T15:33:59Z

Looks good, but we need to check some more, I think...

This was on systems that have X11 stuff provided by the OS.

rjeschmi · 2016-02-25T03:23:57Z

In file included from /export/easybuild/build/Tk/8.6.4/foss-2015b-no-X11/tk8.6.4/unix/../generic/tkPort.h:21:0,
                 from /export/easybuild/build/Tk/8.6.4/foss-2015b-no-X11/tk8.6.4/unix/../generic/tkInt.h:19,
                 from /export/easybuild/build/Tk/8.6.4/foss-2015b-no-X11/tk8.6.4/unix/../generic/tkStubLib.c:14:
/export/easybuild/build/Tk/8.6.4/foss-2015b-no-X11/tk8.6.4/unix/../generic/tk.h:96:25: fatal error: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
 #   include <X11/Xlib.h>
                         ^
In file included from /export/easybuild/build/Tk/8.6.4/foss-2015b-no-X11/tk8.6.4/unix/../generic/ttk/ttkStubLib.c:9:0:
/export/easybuild/build/Tk/8.6.4/foss-2015b-no-X11/tk8.6.4/unix/../generic/tk.h:96:25: fatal error: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
 #   include <X11/Xlib.h>
                         ^
compilation terminated.
compilation terminated.

The headers that are included in Tk are not being found here. I think we are missing a -I. I've fixed this before, but haven't merge it..

rjeschmi · 2016-02-25T03:29:39Z

I realize that this isn't in this PR, but it is blocking me from testing it ..

rjeschmi · 2016-02-25T03:41:01Z

I'll follow up here #2261

rjeschmi · 2016-02-25T05:09:55Z

so the first deps works

== building and installing xcb-proto/1.11-foss-2015b-Python-2.7.11...

but

== processing EasyBuild easyconfig /tmp/eb-BQpQZZ/tweaked_easyconfigs/libxcb-1.11.1-foss-2015b.eb
== building and installing libxcb/1.11.1-foss-2015b...
== fetching files...
== creating build dir, resetting environment...
== unpacking...
== patching...
== preparing...
== configuring...
== FAILED: Installation ended unsuccessfully (build directory: /export/easybuild/build/libxcb/1.11.1/foss-2015b): build failed (first 300 chars): cmd " ./configure --prefix=/export/easybuild/software/libxcb/1.11.1-foss-2015b " exited with exitcode 1 and output:
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gaw
== Results of the build can be found in the log file /tmp/eb-BQpQZZ/easybuild-libxcb-1.11.1-20160225.050320.bZwrl.log
ERROR: Build of /tmp/eb-BQpQZZ/tweaked_easyconfigs/libxcb-1.11.1-foss-2015b.eb failed (err: 'build failed (first 300 chars): cmd " ./configure --prefix=/export/easybuild/software/libxcb/1.11.1-foss-2015b " exited with exitcode 1 and output:\nchecking for a BSD-compatible install... /bin/install -c\nchecking whether build environment is sane... yes\nchecking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p\nchecking for gawk... gaw')
[root@299c3d2f763f ~]# less /tmp/eb-BQpQZZ/easybuild-libxcb-1.11.1-20160225.050320.bZwrl.log

checking if gcc -std=gnu99 supports -Werror=attributes... yes
Package xorg-macros was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `xorg-macros.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'xorg-macros' found
checking whether make supports nested variables... (cached) yes
checking whether to build developer documentation... yes
checking for doxygen... no
configure: WARNING: doxygen not found - documentation targets will be skipped
configure: WARNING: dot not found - doxygen targets will be skipped
checking for CHECK... no
checking for XCBPROTO... yes
checking for NEEDED... no
configure: error: Package requirements (pthread-stubs xau >= 0.99.2) were not met:

Package xproto was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `xproto.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'xproto', required by 'Xau', not found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables NEEDED_CFLAGS
and NEEDED_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.
 (at easybuild/tools/run.py:397 in parse_cmd_output)

hajgato · 2016-02-25T06:29:19Z

@rjeschmi add xproto as builddep for libxcb

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-25T07:04:21Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6576/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hajgato · 2016-02-25T07:06:22Z

@rjeschmi @boegel Strange thing that for me libxcb found xproto, despite it was not dep or builddep.
maybe the solution is to make a big bundle for X and for X headers (proto's).

boegel · 2016-02-25T08:07:24Z

@hajgato: it found which xproto?

hajgato · 2016-02-25T08:12:08Z

@boegel: Ok, I might checked a wrong logfile.
Anyway, probably form system.

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-25T09:57:53Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6584/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-02-25T10:09:51Z

I'd like to see @rjeschmi test this again on a minimal system...

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-25T10:25:38Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6586/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

rjeschmi · 2016-02-25T15:36:22Z

Test report by @rjeschmi
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2676 v3 @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/f7b729e91bc18032f8cd for a full test report.

rjeschmi · 2016-02-25T15:37:07Z

Looks good. Used the foss toolchain and removed Tk from Python, but otherwise good.

boegel · 2016-02-25T20:43:44Z

So, @hajgato, what do you reckon?

hajgato · 2016-02-26T09:58:59Z

@boegel: I did it, so we should merge it (if passes the checks). Anyway I am working on the "bundle" version as well. If you think it is better to use only the bundle, then we do not have to merge it.

hajgato · 2016-02-26T14:02:21Z

@boegel what happens with if a .py file is compiled to a read only .pyc and .pyo and we change the Python version? Will the .py run, or the .pyo/.pyc?

hajgato · 2016-02-26T14:40:15Z

@boegel xcb-proto installs the same .py files using Python-{2.6.6,2.7.11,3.5.1}, so I made a version using system Python and dummy toolchain.

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-26T14:48:09Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6604/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-26T14:51:33Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6605/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-26T23:18:34Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6611/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-02-27T12:37:51Z

+
+sanity_check_paths = {
+    'files': ['lib/pkgconfig/xcb-proto.pc'],
+    'dirs': ['lib/python%s/site-packages/xcbgen' % pyshortver]


this is an issue...

if the system Python is updated from 2.6 to 2.7, this will not be found anymore?

besides, this is not in $PYTHONPATH anyway, as it is now (same issue when we include our own Python version)...

does that mean the Python bits are basically irrelevant?

or maybe this is handled via the pkg-config file?

@boegel: this handled by the pkgconfig:
xcb-proto.pc:

prefix=/apps/brussel/ivybridge/software/xcb-proto/1.11 exec_prefix=${prefix} datarootdir=${prefix}/share datadir=${datarootdir} libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib xcbincludedir=${datadir}/xcb pythondir=${prefix}/lib/python2.6/site-packages Name: XCB Proto Description: X protocol descriptions for XCB Version: 1.11

I am more concerned what will happen with the precompiled pyo files if you change Python version. (especially, if they are read-only)

@boegel:
xcb-proto has only python bits, so they cannot be irrelevant....

OK, not a problem indeed since it's handled by pkg-config

boegel · 2016-03-01T08:14:37Z

+
+builddependencies = [
+    ('xextproto', '7.3.0'),
+    ('xcb-proto', '1.11', '-Python-2.7.11'),


@hajgato: you missed updating this to use the dummy xcb-proto easyconfig?

@boegel aarghhh.

hpcugentbot · 2016-03-01T08:23:50Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6673/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2016-03-01T08:30:02Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6674/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2016-03-01T08:37:09Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6675/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

minor style fixes in X lib easyconfigs

hpcugentbot · 2016-03-01T09:13:55Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6680/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-03-01T09:18:42Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/7a96c98eb2d0cacf502e for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-03-01T09:58:02Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/789b548413436665ca64 for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-03-01T10:00:31Z

Going in, thanks @hajgato!

{vis}[intel-2016b] libX11 1.6.3 (REVIEW)

{vis}[intel-2016b] libX11 1.6.3 (REVIEW)

f6644ed

boegel added this to the v2.7.0 milestone Feb 24, 2016

hajgato mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2016

Make failing for Tk-8.6.4-foss-2015b-no-X11.eb #2261

Closed

added xproto as builddep for libxcb (needed by libXau)

6b5d0f1

added libXdmcp as dep for libxcb

2271ac6

Balazs Hajgato added 2 commits February 26, 2016 15:32

add xcb-proto with system python dep (toolchainless)

b31fab3

use of 'pyver' template

d24df53

syntax corrected

1c72713

boegel reviewed Feb 27, 2016
View reviewed changes

Balazs Hajgato added 2 commits March 1, 2016 09:08

use system python xcb-proto (with dummy toolchain)

c54e558

added comment for xcb-proto

1bc43aa

boegel reviewed Mar 1, 2016
View reviewed changes

libX11 using system python dependent xcb-proto

178df22

minor style fixes in X lib easyconfigs

dabd9c3

boegel mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2016

minor style fixes in X lib easyconfigs hajgato/easybuild-easyconfigs#32

Merged

Merge pull request #32 from boegel/libx11-2016aa

3611310

minor style fixes in X lib easyconfigs

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2016

Merge pull request #2549 from hajgato/libx11-2016aa

407d859

{vis}[intel-2016b] libX11 1.6.3 (REVIEW)

boegel merged commit 407d859 into easybuilders:develop Mar 1, 2016

This was referenced Mar 1, 2016

various libX* easyconfigs w/ intel/2016a #2605

Merged

add missing libX dependencies for cairo #2630

Merged

boegel changed the title ~~{vis}[intel-2016b] libX11 1.6.3 (REVIEW)~~ {vis}[intel-2016a] libX11 1.6.3 (REVIEW) Mar 16, 2016

hajgato deleted the libx11-2016aa branch June 8, 2017 13:18

Conversation

hajgato commented Feb 23, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 23, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 24, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 24, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 24, 2016

Uh oh!

rjeschmi commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

rjeschmi commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

rjeschmi commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

rjeschmi commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

rjeschmi commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

rjeschmi commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 25, 2016

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Feb 26, 2016

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Feb 26, 2016

Uh oh!

hajgato commented Feb 26, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 26, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 26, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 26, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel Feb 27, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Feb 27, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hajgato Feb 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hajgato Feb 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Mar 1, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Mar 1, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hajgato Mar 1, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Mar 1, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Mar 1, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Mar 1, 2016

Uh oh!