Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

(depends on easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1342 and #2879).

Jenkins: ok to test

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7569/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@bartoldeman This PR is missing an hwloc easyconfig, fixed in bartoldeman#2

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7950/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@bartoldeman I traced these OpenMPI sanity check commands failing for you but not for me down to a bug in the EasyBuild framework, see easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1754

The problem was that the module load being done at the start of the sanity check was not being done with the correct (short) module name, which may causes problems when using a hierarchical module naming scheme. The problem remained hidden up until now because it's only a real issue if: the toolchain being used is a non-bundle but an actual software package (like PGI is) and if there are sanity check commands listed that can fail if the module for the toolchain itself is not loaded (as is the case here).

Can you verify whether the fix in easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1754 fixes the issue, i.e. whether you can install OpenMPI using the PGI toolchain with having these sanity check commands active using your hierarchical module naming scheme ToolchainMNS?

It works with PR easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1754 so I uncommented those lines now.

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7963/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@bartoldeman great, thanks for the confirmation!

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2159.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/7b08be48f1ae9244b241feac5639f270 for a full test report.

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2565.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/a024f9289ae5b56f397c4e9cd2696d0b for a full test report.

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2159.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/7b7065bfcafbbe7f29b0cdb6bd6b0836 for a full test report.

edit: using HierarchicalMNS, as confirmation of bugfix easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1754

Jenkins: test this please

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7968/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

Good to go now that easybuilders/easybuild-framework#1342 is merged, thanks @bartoldeman!