[phys]{intel/2016.02-GCC-4.9} VASP 5.4.1#2950
Conversation
|
Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this? |
|
Jenkins: ok to test |
|
|
||
| sources = [SOURCELOWER_TAR_GZ] | ||
|
|
||
| prebuildopts = 'cp arch/makefile.include.linux_intel ./makefile.include; ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please use && rather than ; to glue things together
|
@migueldiascosta although this concerns licensed software, it's still useful for people who have access to it |
| toolchain = {'name': 'intel', 'version': '2016.02-GCC-4.9'} | ||
| toolchainopts = {'usempi': True} | ||
|
|
||
| sources = [SOURCELOWER_TAR_GZ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe include a comment explaining why we don't auto-download this, including a URL with more information on getting access to the sources?
|
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7737/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
|
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7745/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
|
|
||
| prebuildopts = 'cp arch/makefile.include.linux_intel ./makefile.include && ' | ||
|
|
||
| buildopts = 'all LIBS="lib" BLACS="$LIBBLACS" ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is the LIBS='lib' correct? now I'm lost... :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it is, but I suppose it's better to use unset LIBS in case what's in the makefile changes
|
Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7761/console for more details). This pull request is now ready for review/testing. Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do. |
|
Going in, thanks @migueldiascosta! |
Not sure if you're interested in this one (if not, just go ahead and reject the pull request).
On one hand, it's proprietary, so you can only test it if you have access to the package and put it the sources folder (but there are other cases like this in the repository).
On the other hand, again, I couldn't get completely away from some nasty overrides.