Skip to content

{lib}[intel/2016b] gdc-client v1.0.1, libxslt v1.1.29, libyaml v0.1.6 (REVIEW)#3399

Merged
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20160804110916_new_pr_gdc-client101
Aug 4, 2016
Merged

{lib}[intel/2016b] gdc-client v1.0.1, libxslt v1.1.29, libyaml v0.1.6 (REVIEW)#3399
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:20160804110916_new_pr_gdc-client101

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented Aug 4, 2016

(created using eb --new-pr)

…yconfig libxslt-1.1.29-intel-2016b.eb, add easyconfig libyaml-0.1.6-intel-2016b.eb
@boegel boegel added this to the v2.9.0 milestone Aug 4, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 4, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2577.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/824849b0c7187509fe2d802c674021b5 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 4, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2159.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/93e17b8a11c58f7e58ad576e6e9efed9 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 4, 2016

@verdurin please review?

@boegel boegel changed the title {lib}[intel/2016b] gdc-client v1.0.1, libxslt v1.1.29, libyaml v0.1.6 {lib}[intel/2016b] gdc-client v1.0.1, libxslt v1.1.29, libyaml v0.1.6 (REVIEW) Aug 4, 2016
@verdurin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

verdurin commented Aug 4, 2016

Looks fine to me and it builds without any problems.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 4, 2016

Thanks for the review @verdurin!

@boegel boegel merged commit f053597 into easybuilders:develop Aug 4, 2016
@boegel boegel deleted the 20160804110916_new_pr_gdc-client101 branch August 4, 2016 15:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants