Conversation
|
@damianam looks good, but did you test this with this toolchain? a quick test shows a ton of compiler errors, for example: |
|
Well, no. And that's why pushing easyconfigs for us is a pain, we are not deploying the same toolchains and easyconfigs, so testing them requires having a separate EB installation, or pushing all the subtree of dependencies as well. I'll take a look at the error or move it to a GCC based toolchain, where it might work better. |
|
@damianam I think the main issue is the minimal toolchains aspect, i.e. that the easyconfigs you use only work (w.r.t. dependency resolution) when You should be able to contribute back the easyconfig as you used them (except for site-specific customisations), contributing with different toolchains is indeed going to be a PITA. For this particular one: how about using |
|
That is one of the aspects. The other one is that we have customized versions, so pushing something simple like this with our setup might require pushing the whole tree of dependencies. Anyway, it should work now, with the latest commit on the easyblock side |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
lgtm |
|
Going in, thanks @damianam! |
This needs easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#983
Using 2015b because it is the only toolchain with Qt5, but it should work with Qt4 as well.