Skip to content

{lib}[foss/2016a] Pyro4 with foss2016a#3527

Merged
boegel merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
rug-cit-hpc:Pyro4-foss2016a
Sep 6, 2016
Merged

{lib}[foss/2016a] Pyro4 with foss2016a#3527
boegel merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
rug-cit-hpc:Pyro4-foss2016a

Conversation

@RvDijk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@RvDijk RvDijk commented Sep 6, 2016

No description provided.

dependencies = [
('Python', '2.7.11'),
]

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@RvDijk please include a custom sanity check, to make sure this gets installed in the right location (i.e. NOT in the Python installation...)

sanity_check_paths = {
    'files': [],
    'dirs': ['lib/python%(pyshortver)s/site-packages'],
}

@boegel boegel added this to the v2.9.0 milestone Sep 6, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Sep 6, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2698.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/6f0deb8a09e9bc5670439e6019baba38 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Sep 6, 2016

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Sep 6, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2034.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.8, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/4f01a264390cd4154a7d13c6e7dd518d for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Sep 6, 2016

Going in, thanks @RvDijk!

@boegel boegel merged commit f9ce75c into easybuilders:develop Sep 6, 2016
@RvDijk RvDijk deleted the Pyro4-foss2016a branch October 7, 2016 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants