Protobuf 3.0.2#3563
Protobuf 3.0.2#3563boegel merged 6 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom rug-cit-hpc:protobuf302foss2016a
Conversation
protobuf includes libraries, compiling it with the compiler from a toolchain seems better.
protobuf includes libraries, compiling it with the compiler from a toolchain seems better.
| source_urls = ['https://github.com/google/protobuf/archive/v%(version)s'] | ||
| sources = [SOURCE_TAR_GZ] | ||
|
|
||
| versionsuffix = '-Python-%(pyver)s' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@FokkeDijkstra this is overwriting the previous definition for versionsuffix (which is wrong), so move this up and remove the other one?
…ld-easyconfigs into protobuf302foss2016a
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
lgtm |
|
Going in, thanks @FokkeDijkstra! |
Google protobuf 3.0.2 including the Python library. Since protobuf includes libraries that can be used by other programs using a dummy toolchain (as done for older protobuf versions) does not seem to be the right approach.
For now I've choosen the foss 2016a toolchain. Since protobuf itself is a low level compiler and library using a GCC toolchain could also be an option for the main protobuf. Please let me know if this approach is better.