Skip to content

add patch for XZ 5.2.2 to include 5.1.2alpha symbols required by 'rpm' command on CentOS 7.x#4179

Merged
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:XZ522_alpha_symbols
Feb 22, 2017
Merged

add patch for XZ 5.2.2 to include 5.1.2alpha symbols required by 'rpm' command on CentOS 7.x#4179
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:XZ522_alpha_symbols

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented Feb 22, 2017

fix for #4036

cc @verdurin, @hajgato: please test whether this also fixes the problem for you?

@boegel boegel added this to the 3.2.0 milestone Feb 22, 2017
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Feb 22, 2017

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (12 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2107.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.3.1611, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/0dc26e0eb246e5c5b9a85752b2ed4d5a for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Feb 22, 2017

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (11 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2521.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.3.1611, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/01681049b92a8c6fa232f2257a2b4079 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Feb 22, 2017

I've validated that this indeed fixes the issue reported in #4036, and I didn't notice any fallout after rebuilding all intel/2016b easyconfigs that use XZ 5.2.2 as a dependency, so going in!

@boegel boegel merged commit e29bfad into easybuilders:develop Feb 22, 2017
@boegel boegel deleted the XZ522_alpha_symbols branch February 22, 2017 18:30
@hajgato
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

hajgato commented Feb 27, 2017

@boegel I know it is a bit late, but this XZ patch solved the problem with R and CentOS 7.3

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Feb 27, 2017

👍 Thanks for the feedback @hajgato!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants