init PRACE Common Production Environment (CPE)#599
Merged
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom Feb 14, 2014
Merged
init PRACE Common Production Environment (CPE)#599boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Fotis Georgatos <[email protected]>
|
Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this? |
Member
|
Jenkins: ok to test |
Member
|
tested on my end, working fine, so merging in thanks @fgeorgatos! |
boegel
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2014
init PRACE Common Production Environment (CPE)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary: PRACE modulefiles have been working for a few months, on .lu side, w. mild usage.
PR does not implement the variables visible at http://www.prace-ri.eu/PRACE-Common-Production;
these should be provided via an alternative mechanism, possibly via Lmod sorcery.
Also, current code does not define
ftnas spec'd in original PRACE/DEISA guidelines. TBD.Ref: easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#82 (comment) (largely covered)
Signed-off-by: Fotis Georgatos [email protected]