Skip to content

add patch for Bison 3.0.4 to fix installation on top of glibc 2.28#8675

Merged
vanzod merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:Bison304_glibc_fix
Aug 6, 2019
Merged

add patch for Bison 3.0.4 to fix installation on top of glibc 2.28#8675
vanzod merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
boegel:Bison304_glibc_fix

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel commented Aug 6, 2019

cfr. #8501 & #8673

@boegel boegel added the bug fix label Aug 6, 2019
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (3.9.4?) milestone Aug 6, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 6, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
gligar05.gastly.os - Linux fedora 30, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6130 CPU @ 2.10GHz, Python 2.7.16
See https://gist.github.com/e8dd3e8d0dab3db57d4aed20a4f6505d for a full test report.

@boegel boegel changed the title add patch for Bison 3.0.4 to fix installation on top of glibc 2.28 (WIP) add patch for Bison 3.0.4 to fix installation on top of glibc 2.28 Aug 6, 2019
@vanzod
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

vanzod commented Aug 6, 2019

Test report by @vanzod
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (7 easyconfigs in this PR)
cermis - Linux debian 9.9, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5670 @ 2.93GHz, Python 2.7.13
See https://gist.github.com/747332c7005098ea150daaf1619cf131 for a full test report.

@vanzod
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

vanzod commented Aug 6, 2019

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@vanzod vanzod merged commit 3ecafcb into easybuilders:develop Aug 6, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

boegel commented Aug 6, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 32 out of 32 (32 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2036.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/e565953d44f0c21d94d9c9ec9ec7e54c for a full test report.

@boegel boegel deleted the Bison304_glibc_fix branch August 7, 2019 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants