Skip to content

{data}[GCC/8.2.0-2.31.1] savvy v1.3.0 + shrinkwrap v1.0.0-beta#9124

Merged
boegel merged 3 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
branfosj:savvy
Oct 14, 2019
Merged

{data}[GCC/8.2.0-2.31.1] savvy v1.3.0 + shrinkwrap v1.0.0-beta#9124
boegel merged 3 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
branfosj:savvy

Conversation

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The toolchain for savvy is toolchain = {'name': 'GCC', 'version': '8.2.0-2.31.1'} as it depends on HTSlib which has that toolchain - otherwise I'd have put them both at GCCcore.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/7d18ee9a64515dc8c193ff045881faa4 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
bber0501u03a.bb2.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ad2ff6dfc2afca22d52e82176faf56f8 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
bb2c1a09.bb2.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/8f01c49c0f92e66f22a0beb8dd2f7597 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
bear-pg0305u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 7.6, 8335-GTX, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/b1afce3762e9b3a765c39548cdb89a51 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel changed the title savvy and shrinkwrap {data}[GCC/8.2.0-2.31.1] savvy v1.3.0 + shrinkwrap v1.0.0-beta Oct 14, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Oct 14, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
generoso - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v4 @ 2.00GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/7b9501908dfc8d76d59b2be63699216c for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added this to the next release (4.1.0?) milestone Oct 14, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Oct 14, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2072.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/2ffd81f1fdb2ec7bcc904690cb583693 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added the new label Oct 14, 2019
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: next release (4.1.0?), 4.0.1 Oct 14, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Oct 14, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3119.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/8f00f148fffd350d08d5779b0cf88d07 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Oct 14, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2632.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/0e4d97ce333e038791f63fe31a0eedee for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.0.1, 4.x Oct 14, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Oct 14, 2019

Going in, thanks @branfosj!

@boegel boegel merged commit 3119bea into easybuilders:develop Oct 14, 2019
@branfosj branfosj deleted the savvy branch October 14, 2019 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants